On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 6:53 AM, Julian Brown jul...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:33:17 +0100
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana.radhakrish...@linaro.org wrote:
On 6 May 2011 14:13, Julian Brown jul...@codesourcery.com wrote:
Hi,
This is the second of two patches to add
On 4 April 2012 04:17, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/03/2012 05:09 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 03/04/12 12:01, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 11:45:30AM +0100, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
If, so then there's only one way to sort out this mess.
2012/4/4 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com:
Em 3 de abril de 2012 20:48, Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org escreveu:
snip
Yip, as is Ubuntu Precise, Debian unstable, and a skew of Gentoo.
None have been released yet. Here's my understanding:
Fedora
On 4 April 2012 10:56, Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Tue, 3 Apr 2012, Michael Hope wrote:
+#define GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER \
+ %{mhard-float: GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER_HARD_FLOAT } \
+ %{mfloat-abi=hard: GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER_HARD_FLOAT } \
+ %{!mfloat-abi=hard:%{!mhard
On 4 April 2012 18:54, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 01:34:30PM +1200, Michael Hope wrote:
I did two ports of Mandriva to armv7. One of my choice to use softfp,
and another hardfp port to be compatible with other distros. But other
than a previous armv5 port
On 4 April 2012 21:06, Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Wed, 4 Apr 2012, Michael Hope wrote:
The tricky one is new GCC with old GLIBC. GCC may have to do a
configure time test and fall back to /lib/ld-linux.so.3 if the hard
float loader is missing.
I don't think that's
On 5 April 2012 12:07, Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Thu, 5 Apr 2012, Michael Hope wrote:
I don't think that's appropriate for ABI issues. If a different dynamic
linker name is specified, GCC should use it unconditionally (and require
new enough glibc or a glibc
On 5 April 2012 15:56, asha...@chromium.org wrote:
Reviewers: Diego Novillo, jingyu, davidxl,
Message:
Please take a look at this patch and tell me if it's OK for
branches/google/gcc-4_6.
Description:
Backported the following patch from trunk:
2011-10-07 Andrew Stubbs
On 12 April 2012 10:38, Steve McIntyre steve.mcint...@linaro.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 02:06:09AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
And here's the details as promised.
I've started a wiki page at
https://wiki.linaro.org/OfficeofCTO/HardFloat/LinkerPathCallApr2012
with a strawman agenda
2012/4/12 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com:
Em 11 de abril de 2012 20:22, Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org escreveu:
On 12 April 2012 10:38, Steve McIntyre steve.mcint...@linaro.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 02:06:09AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote
On 12 April 2012 12:38, Wookey woo...@wookware.org wrote:
+++ Michael Hope [2012-04-12 12:16 +1200]:
2012/4/12 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com:
All good. My vote is for /lib/ld-arm-linux-gnueabihf.so.3 as it:
Sorry for more bikeshedding,
/lib/ld
2012/4/12 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com:
Em 11 de abril de 2012 21:16, Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org escreveu:
2012/4/12 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com:
Em 11 de abril de 2012 20:22, Michael Hope
] http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-ports/2012-04/msg00064.html
2012-04-23 Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org
* config/arm/linux-eabi.h (GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER_HARD_FLOAT): Define.
(GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER_SOFT_FLOAT): Define.
(GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER): Redefine to use the hard
On 24 April 2012 03:35, Richard Earnshaw rearn...@arm.com wrote:
On 22/04/12 23:20, Michael Hope wrote:
Change the dynamic linker path for ARM hard float executables.
Matches the path discussed and agreed on last week[1]. Carlos will
follow up with the matching patch to GLIBC[2]. I'm happy
On 21 April 2012 00:57, Dinar Temirbulatov dtemirbula...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Here is the patch that adds support for divide 64-bit by constant for
32-bit target machines, this patch was tested on arm-7a with no new
regressions, also I am not sure on how to avoid for example i686
targets
On 27 April 2012 08:20, Carlos O'Donell car...@systemhalted.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org wrote:
2012-04-24 Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org
Richard Earnshaw rearn...@arm.com
* config/arm/linux-eabi.h
On 1 May 2012 03:24, Richard Earnshaw rearn...@arm.com wrote:
On 27/04/12 00:27, Michael Hope wrote:
On 27 April 2012 08:20, Carlos O'Donell car...@systemhalted.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org
wrote:
2012-04-24 Michael Hope michael.h
On 1 May 2012 10:01, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/30/2012 03:47 PM, Michael Hope wrote:
2012-04-27 Michael Hopemichael.h...@linaro.org
* config/arm/linux-eabi.h (GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER): Pick the loader
using a spec rule.
Michael,
can you try this patch please
4.6 builds.
Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu with no regressions. Changes the ERROR to
UNSUPPORTED.
OK for 4.6?
-- Michael
2012-05-21 Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org
PR 53170
Backport from mainline
2011-11-08 Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com
* lib/target
On 21/05/12 21:14, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 05/21/2012 01:45 AM, Michael Hope wrote:
The testsuite for PR52796 uses the 'target c++11' selector which doesn't exist
in 4.6.
This patch backports the selector, clearing the 'ERROR:
g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic-value1.C:
syntax error in target selector
On 24 May 2012 02:16, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wednesday 23 May 2012 04:17:51 Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2012, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 09:56:31 Richard Earnshaw wrote:
[...]
This is a behaviour change. It would need RM approval for
On 24 May 2012 00:27, Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com wrote:
On 05/23/2012 05:39 AM, Michael Hope wrote:
On 21/05/12 21:14, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 05/21/2012 01:45 AM, Michael Hope wrote:
The testsuite for PR52796 uses the 'target c++11' selector which doesn't
exist in 4.6
as expected.
OK for 4.7?
-- Michael
2012-07-25 Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org
Backport from mainline r186389:
2012-04-12 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org
* testsuite/Makefile.am (check_DEJAGNUnormal0): Run
prettyprinters.exp.
* testsuite
cc'ed the libstdc++ list. Ping?
-- Michael
On 25/07/12 12:12, Michael Hope wrote:
The libstdc++ prettyprinters test suite isn't called out in Makefile.am.
Backport Andreas's
patch from mainline so that a sequential test run gives the same results as a
parallel test.
Tested
On 17 August 2012 07:29, Julian Brown jul...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:56:52 +0100
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramra...@arm.com wrote:
On 07/24/12 13:27, Julian Brown wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:15:27 +0100
Julian Brown jul...@codesourcery.com wrote:
Anyway: this
On 8 June 2012 12:15, Hans-Peter Nilsson hans-peter.nils...@axis.com wrote:
(CC to ARM maintainer approving the original patch.)
I'm listing this under caveats rather than improvements and
before the current top ARM-related caveat (as this one is more
important :) because I don't see
On 8 June 2012 15:20, Hans-Peter Nilsson hans-peter.nils...@axis.com wrote:
From: Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 04:42:30 +0200
On 8 June 2012 12:15, Hans-Peter Nilsson hans-peter.nils...@axis.com wrote:
The some source
codes was in the analyzed case a strcpy
On 8 June 2012 16:53, Hans-Peter Nilsson hans-peter.nils...@axis.com wrote:
From: Hans-Peter Nilsson h...@axis.com
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 06:29:04 +0200
From: Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 05:50:52 +0200
The combination of
older Linux ARM kernels and GCC 4.7
On 13 June 2012 02:32, Hans-Peter Nilsson hans-peter.nils...@axis.com wrote:
From: Hans-Peter Nilsson h...@axis.com
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:59:57 +0200
From: Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:04:19 +0200
On 8 June 2012 16:53, Hans-Peter Nilsson hans
On 18 June 2012 22:17, Carrot Wei car...@google.com wrote:
Hi
Could ARM maintainers review following patches?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-06/msg00497.html
64bit add/sub constants.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-05/msg01834.html
64bit and with constants.
/testsuite/
2012-07-03 Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org
PR c++/53814
* g++.dg/cpp0x/nullptr28.C: Change selector for explicit
options.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/nullptr28.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/nullptr28.C
index 05fbe57..4cc790d 100644
--- a/gcc
On 5 July 2012 21:13, Matthew Gretton-Dann matthew.gretton-d...@arm.com wrote:
On 26/06/12 14:44, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 25/06/12 15:59, Matthew Gretton-Dann wrote:
All,
This patch adds support to the ARM backend for generating floating-point
fused multiply-accumulate.
OK?
with a Ubuntu 2.6.35 kernel. Bootstraps OK and clears
all of the PCH testsuite failures. Note that this change is
equivalent to Mikael Pettersson's patch at:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg02252.html
OK for trunk?
-- Michael
gcc/
2011-05-02 Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 3:19 AM, Andrew Stubbs a...@codesourcery.com wrote:
Hi all,
This patch adds support for -mcpu=native, -mtune=native, and -march=native
for ARM Linux hosts.
So far, it only recognises Cortex-A8 and Cortex-A9, so I really need to find
out what the magic part numbers
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Stubbs, Andrew
andrew_stu...@mentor.com wrote:
On 29/08/11 04:29, Michael Hope wrote:
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 3:19 AM, Andrew Stubbsa...@codesourcery.com wrote:
Hi all,
This patch adds support for -mcpu=native, -mtune=native, and -march=native
for ARM Linux
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 5:04 AM, Ulrich Weigand uweig...@de.ibm.com wrote:
Hello,
the problem in PR 50305 turned out to be caused by the ARM back-end
LEGITIMIZE_RELOAD_ADDRESS implementation.
Interesting the fault goes away with -mfpu=neon, perhaps due to the DI
mode operations getting pushed
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 3:20 AM, Greta Yorsh greta.yo...@arm.com wrote:
I'm attaching a new version of the patch. Fixed all comments and retested.
No regression on qemu --with-cpu cortex-a9.
I assume that on the Cortex-A9 this generates a LDM instead of an
expensive LDRD. For reference, a tight
/
2012-03-16 Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org
Backport from mainline
2011-05-05 Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org
PR pch/45979
* config/host-linux.c (TRY_EMPTY_VM_SPACE): Define for
__ARM_EABI__ hosts.
diff --git a/gcc/config/host-linux.c b/gcc/config
the GLIBC loader in hard float mode. The
final line in the spec is missing a '=hard' and always adds
/lib/ld-linux.so.3.
How about:
2012-04-03 Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org
* config/arm/linux-eabi.h (GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER_HARD_FLOAT): Define.
(GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER): Redefine
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Richard Henderson r...@twiddle.net wrote:
I couldn't find anything terribly tricky about the conversion.
The existing push_mult pattern would service thumb1 with just
a tweak or two to the memory predicate and the length.
The existing emit_multi_reg_push
On 10 October 2012 22:57, Richard Earnshaw rearn...@arm.com wrote:
On 10/10/12 03:11, Janis Johnson wrote:
On 10/09/2012 07:39 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 27/09/12 01:02, Janis Johnson wrote:
Test gcc.target/arm/div64-unwinding.c is known to fail for GNU/Linux
targets, as described in
41 matches
Mail list logo