On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 08:41:22AM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hi,
this patch moves init and fini priorities to symbol table instead of trees.
They are already in on-side hashtables, but the hashtables are now maintaned
by symbol table. This is needed for correctness with LTO.
Currently tree
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 01:09:41PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
On 06/20/14 09:33, Tom Tromey wrote:
Trevor == Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com writes:
Trevor I'm curious, what is the reason you choose not to write this in
C++11 or
Trevor later? Its distributed with gcc, so the only case
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 02:29:53PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
On 06/20/2014 12:52 PM, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
Hi,
This patch adds a hash_map class so we can consolidate the boiler plate
around
using hash_table as a map, it also allows
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 03:17:46PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
On 06/24/2014 02:40 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 02:29:53PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
On 06/20/2014 12:52 PM, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
Hi,
This patch
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 11:12:38AM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
Trevor hrm, I know basically nothing about the upcoming changes, but I would
Trevor have expected linking c++03 code against c++11 code would be fine
Trevor especially when the interface doesn't involve any stl.
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 08:23:49PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
On 06/20/2014 12:52 PM, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
Hi,
This patch adds a hash_map class so we can consolidate the boiler plate
around
using hash_table as a map, it also
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 11:06:33PM +0200, Kai Tietz wrote:
Hi Trevor,
your recent commits have broken bootstrap for cygwin/mingw i386 targets with:
should be fixed in r211962. Sorry I didn't realize the const
qualification thing matter in other places, it didn't show up in core
gcc so I
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 03:00:33PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
On 06/25/14 10:05, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
From: tbsaunde tbsaunde@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4
Hi,
Actually we can just store const tre_node * in the hash table, and actually
remove a const cast.
bootstrapped with
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 09:48:00AM +0200, Kai Tietz wrote:
Hi Trev,
2014-06-27 1:55 GMT+02:00 tsaund...@mozilla.com:
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
Hi,
While fixing up the hash_table patch's bustedness here I noticed the code
doesn't make any sense. What it inserts
diff --git a/gcc/ipa-icf.c b/gcc/ipa-icf.c
new file mode 100644
index 000..8a13dca
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/ipa-icf.c
+/* Itializes internal structures according to given number of
initialize
+ if (is_a_helpercgraph_node *::test (node))
shouldn't you just use is_acgraph_node*
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 05:15:20PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hi,
this patch adds structural comparsion into ODR warnings, so we do not rely
on types_compatible_p to checks if the individual variants of same
name looks same. This allows us to give more precise reason for the
mismatch and also
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 09:28:03PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
I can't find the code for the SampleFormat thing, but the rest of them
look like ODR violations to me.
I think it is some define renaming the field, I was also puzled by this one.
On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 09:29:31PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 09:25:50PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Sat, 5 Jul 2014, pins...@gmail.com wrote:
This patch is fine but c++ allows class and struct be used
interchangeable. If there is a compilers which does not
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 11:46:27AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Richard Biene
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 1:08 AM, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
Hi,
So apparently its
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 09:28:55PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On July 7, 2014 9:06:17 PM CEST, Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 11:46:27AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Richard Biene
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote
+++ b/gcc/inchash.h
+class inchash
+{
+ hashval_t val;
normal style would be explicit private: at the end.
+ public:
+
+ /* Start incremential hashing, optionally with SEED. */
+ void begin (hashval_t seed = 0)
+ {
+val = seed;
why isn't this the ctor?
+ /* Add unsigned
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 06:36:31AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 10:40:53PM -0400, Trevor Saunders wrote:
+ public:
+
+ /* Start incremential hashing, optionally with SEED. */
+ void begin (hashval_t seed = 0)
+ {
+val = seed;
why isn't
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 11:49:05AM +0400, Yury Gribov wrote:
On 05/09/2014 07:09 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
I slightly prefer the semantics that gets me just the ChangeLog.
The workflow I'm envisioning is:
I've commited both patches in r212883 and r12884. Mklog now runs as a filter
and
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 02:00:24AM +0200, Oleg Endo wrote:
On Wed, 2014-07-23 at 11:37 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 3:08 AM, Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 06:36:31AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 10:40
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 10:42:51AM +0400, Yury Gribov wrote:
On 07/21/2014 12:55 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
I'm not really sure which is the better UI,
but I'd rather time be spent
on better automatic change log generation.
Yeah. Do you have some particular complaints btw?
I haven't
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 06:29:22PM +0400, Yury Gribov wrote:
On 07/28/2014 03:01 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
Yeah. Do you have some particular complaints btw?
I haven't actually used it in a while, but istr there's an issue where
if you change the prototype of a function mklog makes an entry
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 04:44:29PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
A complaint I heard at Cauldron with the C++ification of GCC passes is
that it's become much more difficult to set breakpoints on the execute
hooks of a pass, now that the passes are classes within anonymous
namespaces.
Well, its
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 03:48:34PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On 2014.11.13 at 15:11 +0100, mliska wrote:
Just two remarks:
+template class T
+class GTY((user)) cgraph_summary T *
+{
+public:
+ /* Default construction takes SYMTAB as an argument. */
+ cgraph_summary
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:23:31PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On 2014.11.14 at 01:19 -0500, Trevor Saunders wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 03:48:34PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On 2014.11.13 at 15:11 +0100, mliska wrote:
+ /* Destructor. */
+ virtual
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 05:27:13PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/12/14 22:55, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
Hi,
This adds a gty cache attribute that calls user code after marking and
before
sweeping allowing user code to mark more objects
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 05:52:51PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/12/14 22:55, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
Hi,
gengtype fails to create valid user marking functions for this type, which is
fixed by using vec here (which seems cleaner anyway
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 05:49:47PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/12/14 22:55, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
Hi,
The only user of this is splay_tree. We only have a couple splay trees in
ggc
memory, and it wasn't clear to me any of them were
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 05:32:08PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/12/14 22:55, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
Hi,
$subject.
bootstrapped + regtested x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, ok?
Trev
ada/
* gcc-interface/decl.c, gcc-interface
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 12:40:23AM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hello,
in general I like this addition - I was not aware that sreal has no support
for negative values.
This would be serious maintainance burden if sreals was used for profile
updating - it is very
easy to get negative
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 07:59:26PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 04:39:00PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 08:59:10PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
b) with GTY, we cannot call destructor
Everything in symbol table is
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 05:46:17AM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
This fixes various leaks of vec buffers seen via valgrind within jit
(both recording and playback).
Various vec within jit::recording are converted to auto_vec.
Various playback::wrapper subclasses containing vec gain a
Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 01:11:22 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] pr63856 - test case
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr63856.c | 15 +++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr63856.c
diff --git
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 09:59:46PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
Hi,
the interesting symbol in the test case for pr61324 is __GLOBAL__sub_I_s.
It
refers to nothing, and is called by nothing, however it is kept (I believe
because of -fkeep
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 09:49:52AM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
On Wed, 2014-11-26 at 09:13 +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Hello!
cgraph*.c and ipa-*.c use xstrdup on strings when dumping them via
fprintf, leaking all of the duplicated buffers.
Is/was there a reason for doing this?
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 09:59:46PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
Hi,
the interesting symbol in the test case for pr61324 is __GLOBAL__sub_I_s.
It
refers to nothing, and is called by nothing, however it is kept (I believe
because of -fkeep
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 03:14:16PM +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:10:00PM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
Resending this email. Seems some spam filter ate it due to the many
email addresses...
Will now
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 02:26:00PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
On 10/06/14 21:24, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
Hi,
This changes almost all of the ggc htab that don't use the if_marked option
to
be hash_tables. I added a for_user gty attribute so
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 09:02:44AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:33 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 02:26:00PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
On 10/06/14 21:24, tsaund
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 04:05:25PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 3:56 AM, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
Hi,
There are still some issues to make this work really nicely, but this part
is
probably good enough its worth
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 09:14:18PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 06:58:25PM +, Sebastian Pop wrote:
Richard Biener wrote:
To give you an example how it looks like, the following code is
generated for
/* fold_negate_exprs convert - (~A) to A + 1. */
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 11:45:37PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Am 03.10.2014 um 17:35 schrieb Jeff Law:
On 10/03/14 08:50, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
Hi,
It was obsoleted back in 2011, so we're good to remove it.
bootstrapped
Hi,
I just merged trunk r209020 into the gimple-front-end branch, please
tell me if you see anything busted ;)
I successfully bootstrapped the merge including building the gimple front
end and its few tests passed.
Trev
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 10:53:07AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 10:37 AM, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
Hi,
just removing some dead code.
bootstrapped + regtested against r209414 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, ok
--- a/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c
@@ -687,8 +687,9 @@ generate_loops_for_partition (struct loop *loop,
partition_t partition,
}
else if (gimple_code (stmt) == GIMPLE_SWITCH)
{
+ gimple_switch
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 12:56:53PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
gcc/
* coretypes.h (gimple_goto): New typedef.
(const_gimple_goto): New typedef.
* gimple.h (gimple_statement_goto): New subclass of
gimple_statement_with_ops, adding the invariant that
stmt-code
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 12:56:57PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
gcc/
* coretypes.h (gimple_eh_filter): New typedef.
(const_gimple_eh_filter): New typedef.
* gimple.h (gimple_statement_base::as_a_gimple_eh_filter): New.
(gimple_build_eh_filter): Return a
diff --git a/gcc/tree-vrp.c b/gcc/tree-vrp.c
index 902b879..62ec9f5 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-vrp.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-vrp.c
@@ -9517,10 +9517,11 @@ fold_predicate_in (gimple_stmt_iterator *si)
else
{
gcc_assert (gimple_code (stmt) == GIMPLE_COND);
+ gimple_cond
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 09:05:43AM -0400, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
On 04/22/2014 04:03 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
First of all, thanks a lot for doing this. Maybe one day we'll have
the same in rtl :-)
But...
David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com writes:
In doing the checked downcasts I ran
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 01:32:24PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 04/23/2014 12:56 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 04/22/14 15:38, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 04/22/2014 10:13 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
On Mon, 2014-04-21 at 18:45 -0400, Trevor Saunders wrote:
--- a/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 05:09:57PM +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
Please remember to send patches to gcc-patches.
I'm wondering if you couldn't just use std::string here. No need to change
one complicated
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 02:31:46AM +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
Hi,
Shall it a good idea to add new warning -Wsizeof-array-argument that
warns when sizeof is applied on parameter declared as an array ?
Seems reasonable enough.
Similar to clang's -Wsizeof-array-argument:
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 06:21:20PM +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
wrote:
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 02:31:46AM +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
Hi,
Shall it a good idea to add new warning -Wsizeof-array-argument
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 09:08:50AM +0400, Yury Gribov wrote:
Hi Trevor,
I think this looks rather useful.
sounds great!
+if (-d .git) {
What about moving default name/addr (with finger, etc.) to else branch?
Well, consider the case git doesn't know, that said I could do
if (-d .git) {
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 09:18:39AM +0400, Yury Gribov wrote:
+# XXX We should probably accept /dev/stdin or maybe magic autodetection of
+# being supposed to get the patch from stdin.
+#
Can we just set $diff to '-' if @ARGV is empty?
sgtm
+# In any case if we got the diff on stdin then
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 02:58:11PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 1:08 PM, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
Hi,
This implements finalizers by keeping a list of registered finalizers
and after every mark but before sweeping
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:39:00AM -0500, seg...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
+# if this is a git tree then take name and email from the git configuration
+if (-d .git) {
+ $gitname = `git config user.name`;
+ chomp($gitname);
+ if ($gitname) {
+ $name = $gitname;
+ }
+
+
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:18:18AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Laurynas Biveinis
laurynas.bivei...@gmail.com wrote:
ISTR we went to typed allocs as part of a transition which not
fully materialised?
Yes. I had plans to replace the call-based GC marker
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 01:44:06PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
On 05/05/14 11:37, Richard Biener wrote:
Well, I hope that Andrew doesn't do without a namespace (and I still
don't believe in what he tries to achieve without laying proper ground-work
throughout the compiler). With a namespace
On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 10:24:31PM +0200, Oleg Endo wrote:
Hi,
I've committed the attached patch as r210040, which reinstates the RTL
pass.
Trevor, could you please double check that you haven't missed any other
cases in your pass refactoring patches?
I have no clue how this happened, I
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 09:52:49PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
I noticed for_each_rtx showing up in profiles and thought I'd have a go
at using worklist-based iterators instead. So far I have three:
FOR_EACH_SUBRTX: iterates over const_rtx subrtxes of a const_rtx
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 07:25:50AM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com writes:
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 09:52:49PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
I noticed for_each_rtx showing up in profiles and thought I'd have a go
at using worklist-based iterators
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 05:14:45PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
GCC's code is full of references to options like:
static bool
gate_vrp (void)
{
return flag_tree_vrp != 0;
}
where flag_tree_vrp is actually an autogenerated macro to:
global_options.x_flag_tree_vrp
This
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:41:46AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 8:41 AM, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
This implements finalizers by keeping a list of registered finalizers
and after every mark but before sweeping check
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 10:14:54AM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
On May 24, 2014, at 4:17 AM, Bernd Schmidt bernds_...@t-online.de wrote:
On 02/13/2014 10:18 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
contrib/
* dg-extract-results.py: New file.
* dg-extract-results.sh: Use it if the environment seems
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 11:54:04AM +0400, Maxim Ostapenko wrote:
Hi,
A years ago there was a discussion (
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-01/msg02437.html) about debugging
compiler ICEs that resulted in a patch from Jakub, which dumps useful
information into temporary file, but for
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 03:09:17PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
The following aims to improve code generation for loops like
those in tree-ssa-alias.c:
auto_vectree, 16 component_refs1;
auto_vectree, 16 component_refs2;
/* Create the stack of handled components for REF1. */
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 04:28:14PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 03:09:17PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
The following aims to improve code generation for loops like
those in tree-ssa
Hi,
I've been working on c++ifying bitmaps and while there make them a
little faster. My current work is in the tbsaunde/bitmap git branch
please look and give comments :)
Some interesting differences
-745 LOC
averaged over 10 runs with a --enable-checking=release g++ on one
~334kloc .i
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 08:57:44AM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
This introduces a new scoped_timevar class. It pushes a given timevar
in its constructor, and pops it in the destructor, giving a much
simpler way to use timevars in the typical case where they can be
scoped.
thanks for doing this.
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:36:27AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 3:56 AM, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
Hi,
There are still some issues to make this work really nicely, but this part
is
probably good enough its worth
+ regtested x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, and checked
picochip-elf is nolonger a recognized target. ok?
Trev
contrib/ChangeLog:
2014-09-04 Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
* compare-all-tests: Don't test picochip.
* config-list.mk: Likewise.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2014-09-04
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 10:43:45AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
On 09/05/14 09:32, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
Hi,
Doing this means we get to remove a fair chunk of runtime checking.
bootstrapped + regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 05:57:13PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 10:43 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
On 09/05/14 09:32, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
Hi,
Doing this means we get to remove a fair chunk of runtime checking
On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 03:38:31PM +, Yury Gribov wrote:
Segher Boessenkool segher at kernel.crashing.org writes:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 07:10:02PM +0400, Yury Gribov wrote:
Now I don't quite like the idea of plugin:
Anything that will make this enabled automatically will meet a
:
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
Hi,
There are still some issues to make this work really nicely, but this part is
probably good enough its worth reviewing.
For one thing you can't use ggc hash_map or set in front ends with some types
or gengtype will decide to put
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 02:55:43PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
On 09/05/14 16:38, Trevor Saunders wrote:
So, in this case it seems to me you basically have two options
A. change the macro to an inline function, and fix up all the callers to
pass the right type. Then rebase that into some sort
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 08:06:02PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 18:49 -0400, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
Hi,
This changes all callers of INSN_DELETED_P to use one of insn-deleted ()
insn-set_deleted () or insn
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 08:38:58PM +0400, Yury Gribov wrote:
Hi all,
This is the third version of the patch. A list of changes since last
version:
* move config to contrib so that it's _not_ enabled by default (current
score is 2/1 in favor of no Vim config by default)
fwiw, I think
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 11:23:11AM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
tsaund...@mozilla.com writes:
diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index c048672..5b27aa8 100644
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2014-09-12 Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 10:32:17AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 5:16 AM, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu with same test results as
unpatched r202185 ok?
That looks like a not too
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 07:17:35PM +0200, Michael Matz wrote:
I'd also like us to not use member privatization in our classes, but
that's not in the patch, but if we could agree on that it would be nice.
Member privatization is quite natural. What specifically do you not like
about the
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 03:23:21PM +0200, Michael Matz wrote:
I don't see anything in Trevor's work that requires jumping through
hoops.
Me neither, from that perspective it's okay. It's merely that I doubt the
value of any syntactic privatization like it's implemented in C++, you can
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:13:27AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
Michael Matz m...@suse.de writes:
What's the benefit of reading and writing such noisy lines? :
*out_mode = mode_;
mode_ =
Hi,
ping ;)
Trev
- Forwarded message from tsaund...@mozilla.com -
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 14:07:22 -0400
From: tsaund...@mozilla.com
To: dnovi...@google.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
Subject: [PATCH] rewrite stack vectors
X-Mailer: git-send-email
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 03:30:47PM -0400, Diego Novillo wrote:
On 2013-10-10 14:07 , tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
This makes the implementation of stack vectors simpler and easier to use.
This
that rev yet).
Trev
Thanks. Diego.
From 3e9b030811d3ff4f5605227171d33561ce59453e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 14:19:29 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] use stack vectors more
---
gcc/cp/semantics.c | 4 +---
gcc/function.c
It is a start, but it doesnt do the rest of the work that needs doing to
really take advantage of it... which will be extensive.
for instance, we should change:
static inline void
! gimple_call_set_lhs (gimple gs, tree lhs)
{
- GIMPLE_CHECK (gs, GIMPLE_CALL);
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 01:38:23PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/05/13 16:23, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
I can't speak for Andrew, but my experience with this kind of object type
casting in a large C++ project is that it's a red
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 10:30:16AM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/07/13 09:00, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
Hi,
This is the result of seeing what it would take to get rid of the has_gate
and
has_execute flags on pass_data. It turns out
On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 10:37:00AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 5:00 PM, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
Hi,
This is the result of seeing what it would take to get rid of the has_gate
and
has_execute flags
On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 10:37:00AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 5:00 PM, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
Hi,
This is the result of seeing what it would take to get rid of the has_gate
and
has_execute flags
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:58:36PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:39 AM, Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
wrote:
On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 10:37:00AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 5:00 PM, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
From: Trevor
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 02:33:00PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/14/13 14:14, Richard Biener wrote:
I'm just pointed out that of all the stuff you changed, these were the
only ones I saw where lifetimes were changed significantly.
I still ask why we need a new type and cannot put this
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:56:24AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/14/13 14:14, Richard Biener wrote:
I'm just pointed out that of all the stuff you changed, these were the
only ones I saw where lifetimes were changed
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:54:05PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:58:36PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:39 AM, Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
wrote
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:11:07PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:56:24AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/14/13 14
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
HI,
This patch adds a class auto_vec which releases its internal storage in its
destructor, but unlike stack_vec it has no built in storage so its reasonable
to use it in objects on the heap. It then replaces a bunch of vectors on the
stack
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:03:53PM +0100, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2013, Trevor Saunders wrote:
This patch adds a class auto_vec which releases its internal
storage in its destructor, but unlike stack_vec it has no built in
storage so its reasonable to use it in objects on the heap
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 03:18:07PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 03:12:34PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
The limit looks reasonable, but you could have used a simple linked
list (and never free).
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 08:43:57AM -0500, Diego Novillo wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com wrote:
Thanks. Committed as rev 205023.
Nice work, but why did you antedate the entries in the various ChangeLog
Oh, that's because of local commits and
1 - 100 of 426 matches
Mail list logo
