On 2012/12/07 00:29:39, asharif wrote:
On 2012/12/06 22:02:16, Diego Novillo wrote:
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 4:51 PM, mailto:asha...@chromium.org
wrote:
I don't think the rule is to *only* update ChangeLog.google*. The
rule
is to update ChangeLog, but also update ChangeLog.google*.
Reviewers: asharif1, jingyu,
Message:
Hi Jing and Ahmad,
This adds a new test base line for x86_64-cros-linux-gnu. Please take a
look.
Thanks,
Han
Description:
The new test base line for x86_64-cros-linux-gnu.
Please review this at http://codereview.appspot.com/5990044/
Affected files:
A
Reviewers: asharif1, jingyu, Diego Novillo,
Message:
Hi, the newest chrome gcc (from google-main) fails to linking anything,
by looking into specs file, it seems that 'link_emulation' section is
missing in specs.
The problem I found is that SUBTARGET_EXTRA_SPECS, which is not empty
for
On 2012/05/11 18:48:40, carrot wrote:
Please add ChangeLog and the trunk patch revision.
Thanks.
Trunk patch revision is 186859.
ChangeLog entry added.
Patch started.
diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index 2f85855..588fa04 100644
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@
On 2012/05/11 22:15:37, carrot wrote:
http://codereview.appspot.com/6206055/diff/4001/gcc/ChangeLog
File gcc/ChangeLog (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6206055/diff/4001/gcc/ChangeLog#newcode11
gcc/ChangeLog:11:
It seems you also merged in another patch r187012, please mention it.
On 2012/04/12 21:14:29, shenhan wrote:
Hi, the newest chrome gcc (from google-main) fails to linking
anything, by
looking into specs file, it seems that 'link_emulation' section is
missing in
specs.
The problem I found is that SUBTARGET_EXTRA_SPECS, which is not empty
for
chromeos
Reviewers: asharif1, jingyu,
Message:
Hi Amhad and Jing, could you take a look at this CL at
http://codereview.appspot.com/6210060/
Thanks,
-Han
Description:
Ported r187569 from google/gcc-4_6 branch.
2012-05-11 Han Shen shen...@google.com
Backport from mainline.
2012-05-01
On 2012/05/16 17:27:59, asharif1 wrote:
On 2012/05/16 01:02:26, shenhan wrote:
Hi Amhad and Jing, could you take a look at this CL at
http://codereview.appspot.com/6210060/
Thanks,
-Han
Shouldn't this have a corresponding ChangeLog entry and a
ChangeLog.google-gcc-4_6 entry?
Hi Ahmad
On 2012/05/16 23:30:28, Diego Novillo wrote:
On 12-05-16 19:22 , mailto:jin...@google.com wrote:
In my opinion, gcc/ChangeLog is for upstream commits only.
It is fine that you want to port upstream gcc/ChangeLog as well.
Just
remove your identities
+2012-05-11 Han Shen
On 2012/05/18 18:35:32, jingyu wrote:
Backport from trunk r187586
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2012-05/msg00583.html
Enable -fstack-protector support for Android targets.
The patch only affects targets where __BIONIC__ is defined.
Built Android arm toolchain.
Would like to commit the
Reviewers: ,
Message:
Hi, this is to port the patch from google/main to trunk, which provides
a new stack protection option - fstack-protector-strong.
Previous review for google trunk is here -
http://codereview.appspot.com/5461043
Status - it has been used in google/main for 2 quarters,
On 2011/11/16 00:47:10, shenhan wrote:
2011-11-15 Han Shen mailto:shen...@google.com
* gcc/Makefile.in:
* gcc/configure:
* gcc/cppdefault.c:
diff --git a/gcc/Makefile.in b/gcc/Makefile.in
index ae4f4da..0a05783 100644
--- a/gcc/Makefile.in
+++ b/gcc/Makefile.in
Hi, Joseph, get a chance to take a look? Thanks!
-Han
On 2011/11/19 00:10:20, shenhan wrote:
Hi, Joseph, thanks!
ChangeLog entries added to the issue description.
ChangeLog
* Makefile.in (GPLUSPLUS_INCLUDE_DIR_ADD_SYSROOT): add a macro
definition to compile command
Ping?
http://codereview.appspot.com/5394041/
14 matches
Mail list logo
