Hi all,
because pr81773 is a 6-/7-/8-regression I have backported it to gcc-6 as r259741
and gcc-7 as r259742.
Regards,
Andre
On Sat, 14 Apr 2018 16:46:53 +0200
Andre Vehreschild wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> thank you for the review. Committed as r259385.
>
> Regards,
> Andre
>
> On
Hi Paul,
thank you for the review. Committed as r259385.
Regards,
Andre
On Sat, 14 Apr 2018 11:53:44 +0100
Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> This is OK for trunk.
>
> Thanks for the patch
>
> Paul
>
>
> On 13 April 2018 at 08:34, Andre Vehreschild wrote:
> > Ping
> >
> >
Hi Andre,
This is OK for trunk.
Thanks for the patch
Paul
On 13 April 2018 at 08:34, Andre Vehreschild wrote:
> Ping
>
> On Sun, 8 Apr 2018 14:25:50 +0200
> Andre Vehreschild wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> attached patch fixes (to my knowledge) the two PRs 81773 and 83606 where the
>> result of a
Ping
On Sun, 8 Apr 2018 14:25:50 +0200
Andre Vehreschild wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> attached patch fixes (to my knowledge) the two PRs 81773 and 83606 where the
> result of a coarray get() operation is assigned to an array using a vector as
> index. It took me quite long to get it right, because I
Hi all,
attached patch fixes (to my knowledge) the two PRs 81773 and 83606 where the
result of a coarray get() operation is assigned to an array using a vector as
index. It took me quite long to get it right, because I had to use the
scalarizer which I haven't use directly before. So reviewers wi
