On Thu, 13 Oct 2016, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
> On 12/10/16 21:00, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Oct 2016, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
> >
> > > This patch is a follow up of [1] which aims to have all memory model
> > > related
> > > declarations in memmodel.h. To achieve that, this patch moves
On 12/10/16 21:00, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Wed, 12 Oct 2016, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
This patch is a follow up of [1] which aims to have all memory model related
declarations in memmodel.h. To achieve that, this patch moves memory model
related declaration from coretypes.h into memmodel.h. Note
On Wed, 12 Oct 2016, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2016, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
>
> > This patch is a follow up of [1] which aims to have all memory model related
> > declarations in memmodel.h. To achieve that, this patch moves memory model
> > related declaration from coretypes.h into
On Wed, 12 Oct 2016, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
> This patch is a follow up of [1] which aims to have all memory model related
> declarations in memmodel.h. To achieve that, this patch moves memory model
> related declaration from coretypes.h into memmodel.h. Note that since
> memmodel.h is now incl
Hi,
This patch is a follow up of [1] which aims to have all memory model related
declarations in memmodel.h. To achieve that, this patch moves memory model
related declaration from coretypes.h into memmodel.h. Note that since memmodel.h
is now included from libgcc it needs to have a runtime li