Improve error message, and remove a redundant check, as the same check is
done a bit earlier due to the PR 48587 patch.

2016-10-16  Janne Blomqvist  <j...@gcc.gnu.org>

        PR libfortran/48587
        * io/transfer.c (data_transfer_init): Improve error message,
        remove redundant check.

Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Committed as obvious.
---
 libgfortran/io/transfer.c | 11 ++---------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/libgfortran/io/transfer.c b/libgfortran/io/transfer.c
index 7696cca..2232417 100644
--- a/libgfortran/io/transfer.c
+++ b/libgfortran/io/transfer.c
@@ -2606,7 +2606,8 @@ data_transfer_init (st_parameter_dt *dtp, int read_flag)
       /* This means we tried to access an external unit < 0 without
         having opened it first with NEWUNIT=.  */
       generate_error (&dtp->common, LIBERROR_BAD_OPTION,
-                     "Invalid unit number in statement");
+                     "Unit number is negative and unit was not already "
+                     "opened with OPEN(NEWUNIT=...)");
       return;
     }
   else if (dtp->u.p.current_unit->s == NULL)
@@ -2614,14 +2615,6 @@ data_transfer_init (st_parameter_dt *dtp, int read_flag)
        st_parameter_open opp;
        unit_convert conv;
 
-      if (dtp->common.unit < 0 && !is_internal_unit (dtp))
-       {
-         close_unit (dtp->u.p.current_unit);
-         dtp->u.p.current_unit = NULL;
-         generate_error (&dtp->common, LIBERROR_BAD_OPTION,
-                         "Bad unit number in statement");
-         return;
-       }
       memset (&u_flags, '\0', sizeof (u_flags));
       u_flags.access = ACCESS_SEQUENTIAL;
       u_flags.action = ACTION_READWRITE;
-- 
2.7.4

Reply via email to