On 03/06/2012 07:22 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 03/06/12 09:55, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Richard Henderson writes:
On 03/06/12 02:13, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Ralf Corsepius writes:
* Incompatiblible/insufficient binutils (I am using binutils-2.22)?
* Some as/ld-flags getting lost/improperl
On 03/06/12 09:55, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Richard Henderson writes:
>
>> On 03/06/12 02:13, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>>> Ralf Corsepius writes:
>>>
* Incompatiblible/insufficient binutils (I am using binutils-2.22)?
* Some as/ld-flags getting lost/improperly propagated during
assemb
Richard Henderson writes:
> On 03/06/12 02:13, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Ralf Corsepius writes:
>>
>>> * Incompatiblible/insufficient binutils (I am using binutils-2.22)?
>>> * Some as/ld-flags getting lost/improperly propagated during
>>> assembly/linking?
>>> * Bad/incompatible inline-asm hard
On 03/06/12 02:13, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Ralf Corsepius writes:
>
>> * Incompatiblible/insufficient binutils (I am using binutils-2.22)?
>> * Some as/ld-flags getting lost/improperly propagated during
>> assembly/linking?
>> * Bad/incompatible inline-asm hard-coded somewhere?
>
> TAS needs at
Ralf Corsepius writes:
> * Incompatiblible/insufficient binutils (I am using binutils-2.22)?
> * Some as/ld-flags getting lost/improperly propagated during
> assembly/linking?
> * Bad/incompatible inline-asm hard-coded somewhere?
TAS needs at least ISA_B, ie. at least CFV4.
Andreas.
--
Andrea
On 03/05/2012 07:44 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
--- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-03-04
21:01:28 UTC ---
Created attachment 26827
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26827
reduced test case in C
Depends on target CPU selection. -mcpu=680[012346]0 and -mcpu=cpu32 al
> --- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-03-04
> 21:01:28 UTC ---
> Created attachment 26827
> --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26827
> reduced test case in C
>
> Depends on target CPU selection. -mcpu=680[012346]0 and -mcpu=cpu32 all work,
> but -mcpu=5206 (or apparently
