On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 10:15:11AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> On 10/17/2016 05:39 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> >(dwarf_version >= 5 ? 128 : 64)
>>
>> Please make this a macro. OK with that change.
>
> DWARF_LARGEST_DATA_FORM_BITS ? Or d
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 10:15:11AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 10/17/2016 05:39 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >(dwarf_version >= 5 ? 128 : 64)
>
> Please make this a macro. OK with that change.
DWARF_LARGEST_DATA_FORM_BITS ? Or do you have better name?
Jakub
On 10/17/2016 05:39 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
(dwarf_version >= 5 ? 128 : 64)
Please make this a macro. OK with that change.
Jason
Hi!
DWARF5 has a new 128-bit constant class form, this patch uses it
e.g. for __int128 values.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
2016-10-17 Jakub Jelinek
* dwarf2out.c (size_of_die, value_format, output_die): Use
DW_FORM_data16 for 128-bit d