Re: [PATCH] Fix ubsan in gimple-fold.c (PR tree-optimization/82491).

2018-02-19 Thread Jeff Law
On 02/19/2018 05:38 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> The patch was suggested by Richard Biener and then Richard Sandiford helped 
> me to
> rewrite it using poly-int. It prevents ubsan in gimple-fold.
> 
> Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux and survives regression tests.
> And it does not trigger ubsan in the test-case in gimple-fold.c.
> 
> Ready to be installed?
> Martin
> 
> gcc/ChangeLog:
> 
> 2018-02-19  Martin Liska  
>   Richard Sandiford  
> 
>   PR tree-optimization/82491
>   * gimple-fold.c (get_base_constructor): Make earlier bail out
>   to prevent ubsan.
OK.
jeff


[PATCH] Fix ubsan in gimple-fold.c (PR tree-optimization/82491).

2018-02-19 Thread Martin Liška
Hi.

The patch was suggested by Richard Biener and then Richard Sandiford helped me 
to
rewrite it using poly-int. It prevents ubsan in gimple-fold.

Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux and survives regression tests.
And it does not trigger ubsan in the test-case in gimple-fold.c.

Ready to be installed?
Martin

gcc/ChangeLog:

2018-02-19  Martin Liska  
Richard Sandiford  

PR tree-optimization/82491
* gimple-fold.c (get_base_constructor): Make earlier bail out
to prevent ubsan.
---
 gcc/gimple-fold.c | 10 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)


diff --git a/gcc/gimple-fold.c b/gcc/gimple-fold.c
index e556f050e43..c9dad6f42d1 100644
--- a/gcc/gimple-fold.c
+++ b/gcc/gimple-fold.c
@@ -6442,13 +6442,9 @@ get_base_constructor (tree base, poly_int64_pod *bit_offset,
 
   if (TREE_CODE (base) == MEM_REF)
 {
-  if (!integer_zerop (TREE_OPERAND (base, 1)))
-	{
-	  if (!tree_fits_shwi_p (TREE_OPERAND (base, 1)))
-	return NULL_TREE;
-	  *bit_offset += (mem_ref_offset (base).force_shwi ()
-			  * BITS_PER_UNIT);
-	}
+  poly_offset_int boff = *bit_offset + mem_ref_offset (base) * BITS_PER_UNIT;
+  if (!boff.to_shwi (bit_offset))
+	return NULL_TREE;
 
   if (valueize
 	  && TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (base, 0)) == SSA_NAME)