Re: [patch, fortran] Fix PR 52893

2012-04-07 Thread Thomas Koenig
Hi Paul, OK for trunk and for 4.7. Committed as rev. 186213. As a matter of curiosity, why did you not inhibit common function extraction when the function arguments contain an implicit loop variable, rather than when they are in an implicit loop? That would make the optimisation rather les

Re: [patch, fortran] Fix PR 52893

2012-04-07 Thread Paul Richard Thomas
Dear Thomas, > after some time with a defective computer, I am back online. It seems to be catching both my linux laptop and my desktop are as dead as door-nails. > > Here is a fix for PR 52893 (which I just submitted, I wanted to > set a new record between bug posting and patch submissin :

[patch, fortran] Fix PR 52893

2012-04-06 Thread Thomas Koenig
Hello world, after some time with a defective computer, I am back online. Here is a fix for PR 52893 (which I just submitted, I wanted to set a new record between bug posting and patch submissin :-), a wrong-code regression for trunk and 4.7. Regression-tested. OK for both? Thomas 201