On Fri, 6 Apr 2012, Doug Evans wrote:
> btw, is there any interest in mirroring gcc/contrib -> src/contrib?
> [instead of gdb having its own copy in gdb/testsuite, it *could* use
> the one in, e.g., src/contrib. I don't have a strong opinion. I'm
> just looking for others opinions, as the topic ca
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Tom Tromey wrote:
>> "Doug" == Doug Evans writes:
>
> Doug> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Mike Stump
> wroteDoug> btw, is there any interest in mirroring gcc/contrib -> src/contrib?
> Doug> [instead of gdb having its own copy in gdb/testsuite, it *could*
> "Doug" == Doug Evans writes:
Doug> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Mike Stump
wroteDoug> btw, is there any interest in mirroring gcc/contrib -> src/contrib?
Doug> [instead of gdb having its own copy in gdb/testsuite, it *could* use
Doug> the one in, e.g., src/contrib. I don't have a str
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Mar 15, 2012, at 11:09 AM, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> Still, kfail is standard DejaGnu, not a GDB invention. It'd be nice not to
>> need to fork the script for this.
>
> The change is fine for the gcc tree.
Committed (to the gcc tree, already i
On Mar 15, 2012, at 11:09 AM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> Still, kfail is standard DejaGnu, not a GDB invention. It'd be nice not to
> need to fork the script for this.
The change is fine for the gcc tree.
On 03/14/2012 08:15 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Mar 14, 2012, at 10:21 AM, Doug Evans wrote:
>> The results of running the testsuite in parallel should match the
>> results when run serially. This patch adds KFAIL counts so that happens.
>> [There's still a nit that the order of the results don't
On Mar 14, 2012, at 10:21 AM, Doug Evans wrote:
> The results of running the testsuite in parallel should match the
> results when run serially. This patch adds KFAIL counts so that happens.
> [There's still a nit that the order of the results don't precisely match,
> but that's a separate issue.]
The results of running the testsuite in parallel should match the
results when run serially. This patch adds KFAIL counts so that happens.
[There's still a nit that the order of the results don't precisely match,
but that's a separate issue.]
I will check this into the gdb tree if there are no ob
