On 10/19/2016 08:20 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
On Okt 19 2016, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
Could you try compiling manually the failing test with gfortran -static
and then run it to see what happens.
That does not change anything.
Also what target is this failing on.
aarch64 and m68k.
Andreas.
On Okt 19 2016, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> Could you try compiling manually the failing test with gfortran -static
> and then run it to see what happens.
That does not change anything.
> Also what target is this failing on.
aarch64 and m68k.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
On Okt 19 2016, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> The patch changes nothing related to any particular target. If I were to
> hazard a guess I would think the tests are linking against a wrong version
> of the library, the follow on patch (not yet committed) is bumping the
> libgfortran major version number.
On 10/19/2016 04:04 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
At line 74 of file /opt/gcc/gcc-20161019/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dtio_17.f90
(unit = 28, file = '/tmp/gfortrantmpQF10b7')
Fortran runtime error: Bad value during integer read
Error termination. Backtrace:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/dtio_17.f90 -O1 execu
On 10/19/2016 01:59 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
Hi,
On 18 October 2016 at 04:45, Steve Kargl
wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 06:02:52PM -0700, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
Hi all,
The attached patch enables the size= specifier in a READ statement to work with
child DTIO procedures. This is accomplish
At line 74 of file /opt/gcc/gcc-20161019/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dtio_17.f90
(unit = 28, file = '/tmp/gfortrantmpQF10b7')
Fortran runtime error: Bad value during integer read
Error termination. Backtrace:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/dtio_17.f90 -O1 execution test
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE La
Hi,
On 18 October 2016 at 04:45, Steve Kargl
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 06:02:52PM -0700, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The attached patch enables the size= specifier in a READ statement to work
>> with
>> child DTIO procedures. This is accomplished by moving the size_used variabl
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 06:02:52PM -0700, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The attached patch enables the size= specifier in a READ statement to work
> with
> child DTIO procedures. This is accomplished by moving the size_used variable
> from the dtp structure to the gfc_unit structure so tha
Hi all,
The attached patch enables the size= specifier in a READ statement to work with
child DTIO procedures. This is accomplished by moving the size_used variable
from the dtp structure to the gfc_unit structure so that the accumulation of
bytes during READ is carried across the procedures v
