Re: [patch][rfa] Do not call output_constant from the front end

2012-04-02 Thread Richard Guenther
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Rainer Orth wrote: > Steven Bosscher writes: > >> Therefore, an RFA for the attached patch. Bootstrapped&tested on >> powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK? > > Unfortunately, this patch completely broke libjava testing on > i386-pc-solaris2* and x86_64-unknown-linux-gn

Re: [patch][rfa] Do not call output_constant from the front end

2012-04-02 Thread Rainer Orth
Steven Bosscher writes: > Therefore, an RFA for the attached patch. Bootstrapped&tested on > powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK? Unfortunately, this patch completely broke libjava testing on i386-pc-solaris2* and x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu: all execution tests fail with a SEGV: Program received sign

Re: [patch][rfa] Do not call output_constant from the front end

2012-03-29 Thread Steven Bosscher
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Richard Guenther wrote: >> Therefore, an RFA for the attached patch. Bootstrapped&tested on >> powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK? > > Ok. Thanks. Committed as r185977. Ciao! Steven

Re: [patch][rfa] Do not call output_constant from the front end

2012-03-28 Thread Richard Guenther
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote: > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Steven Bosscher > wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Eric Botcazou >> wrote: With this patch a variable named "_Jv_CLS" is written out. The assembly before and after the patch is the

[patch][rfa] Do not call output_constant from the front end

2012-03-27 Thread Steven Bosscher
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote: > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote: >>> With this patch a variable named "_Jv_CLS" is written out. The >>> assembly before and after the patch is the same, except for the >>> variable name. I want to write out a nameles