On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 3:48 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 03:39:36PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 1:13 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
>> > But I'm also wondering about massage_init_elt. It has
>> > tree t = fold_non_dependent_expr (init);
>> > t = mayb
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 03:39:36PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 1:13 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > But I'm also wondering about massage_init_elt. It has
> > tree t = fold_non_dependent_expr (init);
> > t = maybe_constant_init (t);
> > but given that fold_non_dependent_e
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 1:13 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> In this testcase we have a constexpr function, value_to_char_helper. Its body
> is
>for (size_t i = 0u; i < alphabet_t::value_size; ++i)
> value_to_char[i] = to_char(alphabet.assign_rank(i));
>
> which is genericized to a LOOP_EXPR
In this testcase we have a constexpr function, value_to_char_helper. Its body
is
for (size_t i = 0u; i < alphabet_t::value_size; ++i)
value_to_char[i] = to_char(alphabet.assign_rank(i));
which is genericized to a LOOP_EXPR looking roughly like this:
while (1)
{
if (i > 3)
