On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 10:21 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> 65821 complains that in this testcase, setting a breakpoint on main()
> ends up stopping at the line with the default argument of foo(). I
> think I agree that the confusion from this debugging experience
> outweighs the usefulness of being
65821 complains that in this testcase, setting a breakpoint on main()
ends up stopping at the line with the default argument of foo(). I
think I agree that the confusion from this debugging experience
outweighs the usefulness of being able to step through evaluation of a
default argument, so this
