Svante Signell, on Wed 04 May 2016 23:25:28 +0200, wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 23:06 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Svante Signell, on Wed 04 May 2016 19:43:27 +0200, wrote:
> > > May I comment on Debian way of apt-get source gcc-*: Doing that
> > > does
> > > not unpack the sources, neither
On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 23:06 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, on Wed 04 May 2016 19:43:27 +0200, wrote:
> > May I comment on Debian way of apt-get source gcc-*: Doing that
> > does
> > not unpack the sources, neither does it apply the patches, you have
> > to
> > unpack and patch befo
Svante Signell, on Wed 04 May 2016 19:43:27 +0200, wrote:
> May I comment on Debian way of apt-get source gcc-*: Doing that does
> not unpack the sources, neither does it apply the patches, you have to
> unpack and patch before you can change sources and update patches. Iv'e
> patched the sources s
> I.e. the proposed change below.
Applied on mainline and 6 branch. Please post patches as attachments instead
of plain text though, this avoids nasty surprises from mail readers.
--
Eric Botcazou
On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 18:43 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> OnSamuel Thibault, on Wed 04 May 2016 17:29:48 +0200, wrote:
> >
> > > - -- From: /usr/include/unistd.h __getpagesize or
> > > getpagesize??
> > > - function Get_Page_Size return int;
> > > + -- From: /usr/include/i386-gnu/bits/shm
On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 17:34 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Samuel Thibault, on Wed 04 May 2016 17:29:48 +0200, wrote:
> > The gcc-6 build failed. I see that one of the change is:
> >
> > - -- From: /usr/include/unistd.h __getpagesize or getpagesize??
> > - function Get_Page_Size return int;
> 2016-05-04 Samuel Thibault
>
> * s-osinte-gnu.ads: Make Get_Page_Size return int, and make it use
> getpagesize instead of __getpagesize.
>
> --- a/src/gcc/ada/s-osinte-gnu.ads
> +++ b/src/gcc/ada/s-osinte-gnu.ads
> @@ -344,10 +344,9 @@ package System.OS_Interface is
> -- returns the st
Samuel Thibault, on Wed 04 May 2016 17:29:48 +0200, wrote:
> The gcc-6 build failed. I see that one of the change is:
>
> - -- From: /usr/include/unistd.h __getpagesize or getpagesize??
> - function Get_Page_Size return int;
> + -- From: /usr/include/i386-gnu/bits/shm.h __getpagesize or ge
Hello Svante,
The gcc-6 build failed. I see that one of the change is:
- -- From: /usr/include/unistd.h __getpagesize or getpagesize??
- function Get_Page_Size return int;
+ -- From: /usr/include/i386-gnu/bits/shm.h __getpagesize or getpagesize??
+ function Get_Page_Size return size_t;
On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 09:41 +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> >
> > Attaching the modified ada-hurd.diff. Maybe it is ready for inclusion in
> > upstream now?
> Upstream already contains the first set of changes though. Here's what I
> have
> installed on mainline and 6 branch (not sure it will be i
> Attaching the modified ada-hurd.diff. Maybe it is ready for inclusion in
> upstream now?
Upstream already contains the first set of changes though. Here's what I have
installed on mainline and 6 branch (not sure it will be in the 6.1 release).
2016-04-27 Svante Signell
* gcc-inte
> Attaching the modified ada-hurd.diff. Maybe it is ready for inclusion in
> upstream now?
Patch is OK, go ahead and commit it, thanks.
> 2016-03-31 Svante Signell
>
> * gcc-interface/Makefile.in: Add support for x86 GNU/Hurd.
> * s-osinte-gnu.ads: New specification file.
>
On Mon, 2016-04-25 at 11:50 +0200, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
> >
> > Is replacing
> >
> > +-- Copyright (C) 1991-1994, Florida State
> > University--
> > +-- Copyright (C) 1995-2014,
> > AdaCore --
> > +-- Copyright (C) 2015-201
> Is replacing
>
> +-- Copyright (C) 1991-1994, Florida State
> University--
> +-- Copyright (C) 1995-2014,
> AdaCore --
> +-- Copyright (C) 2015-2016, Free Software Foundation,
> Inc. --
>
> with only
>
> +--
On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 10:29 +0200, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
> >
> > The updated attachment was included in message
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg01659.html
> You should just put a FSF copyright on s-osinte-gnu.adb
>
> OK with this change.
Is replacing
+-- Copyright
> The updated attachment was included in message
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg01659.html
You should just put a FSF copyright on s-osinte-gnu.adb
OK with this change.
Arno
ping!
The updated attachment was included in message
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg01659.html
On Thu, 2016-03-31 at 11:33 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-03-17 at 08:51 +0100, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The copyright notices are
On Thu, 2016-03-17 at 08:51 +0100, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > The copyright notices are wrong (or at least incomplete).
> > Hi, what is wrong then, copyright years and/or the text?
> Both. The copyright year should include 2016 and the text should be
> copyright FSF, not AdaCore.
Atta
> > The copyright notices are wrong (or at least incomplete).
>
> Hi, what is wrong then, copyright years and/or the text?
Both. The copyright year should include 2016 and the text should be
copyright FSF, not AdaCore.
Arno
> Yes, you are right, somehow I submitted the old patch. Attached is the
> updated one, with a proposed ChangeLog entry included.
The copyright notices are wrong (or at least incomplete).
Arno
>
> Thanks!
> 2016-03-16 Svante Signell
>
> * gcc-interface/Makefile.in: Add support for x
Sorry for manually creating this mail. Replying to Arnauds message crashes my
mail client (evolution).
On Wed, 2016-03-16 at 11:53 +0100, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
> Yes, you are right, somehow I submitted the old patch. Attached is the
> updated one, with a proposed ChangeLog entry included.
>
> The
On Wed, 2016-03-16 at 11:53 +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> >
> > Sorry for not supplying a ChangeLog yet, I've been busy lately with other
> > things. Since there is another new file s-osinte-gnu.adb in the latest
> > patch, that might be added too.
> AFAICS there is only s-osinte-gnu.ads in the po
> Sorry for not supplying a ChangeLog yet, I've been busy lately with other
> things. Since there is another new file s-osinte-gnu.adb in the latest
> patch, that might be added too.
AFAICS there is only s-osinte-gnu.ads in the posted patch.
--
Eric Botcazou
On Wed, 2016-03-16 at 11:08 +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> >
> > Maybe the time has come now for a proper inclusion of Ada/Gnat support in
> > gcc-* for GNU/Hurd. (Yes, I commit to maintain Ada in gcc for GNU/Hurd in
> > the foreseeable future, according to my abilities).
> >
> > Attached is an up
> Maybe the time has come now for a proper inclusion of Ada/Gnat support in
> gcc-* for GNU/Hurd. (Yes, I commit to maintain Ada in gcc for GNU/Hurd in
> the foreseeable future, according to my abilities).
>
> Attached is an updated patch, now living e.g. in GNU/Debian versions of
> gcc-5 and gcc-
[adding Eric for review]
On 02.03.2016 00:42, Svante Signell wrote:
Hello,
As time progresses, the ada-hurd.diff patch has now been living in Debian since
gcc-4.6 and is now in gcc-5 and gcc-6. Last try to get it included upstream was
in 2012, and 2014, e.g see
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patche
Hello,
As time progresses, the ada-hurd.diff patch has now been living in Debian since
gcc-4.6 and is now in gcc-5 and gcc-6. Last try to get it included upstream was
in 2012, and 2014, e.g see
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-06/msg0.html
and follow-ups.
Maybe the time has come now fo
27 matches
Mail list logo