gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: nd
> Subject: Re: [PATCH][Arm] Test suite failures resulting from deprecation of
> -mstructure-size-boundary
>
> On 09/08/17 06:25, Michael Collison wrote:
>> Because the comment (for example) in g+=.dg/ext/packed8.C says
>>
>> /
option.
-Original Message-
From: Richard Earnshaw (lists) [mailto:richard.earns...@arm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 9, 2017 1:21 AM
To: Michael Collison ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: nd
Subject: Re: [PATCH][Arm] Test suite failures resulting from deprecation of
-mstructure-size-boundary
On
---
> From: Richard Earnshaw (lists) [mailto:richard.earns...@arm.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 7, 2017 5:32 AM
> To: Michael Collison ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: nd
> Subject: Re: [PATCH][Arm] Test suite failures resulting from deprecation of
> -mstructure-size-boundary
>
> On
ary=8 option why was it added
in the first place?
-Original Message-
From: Richard Earnshaw (lists) [mailto:richard.earns...@arm.com]
Sent: Monday, August 7, 2017 5:32 AM
To: Michael Collison ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: nd
Subject: Re: [PATCH][Arm] Test suite failures resulting from deprec
On 06/08/17 00:25, Michael Collison wrote:
> This patch fixes test case failures on arm targets due to
> '-mstructure-size-boundary' being deprecated. The test cases were failing
> because a warning was being issued and due to the fact that the size of
> packed and unpacked structures is the sam
