RE: [RFC,PATCH] Using equivalences to help eliminate_regs_in_insn

Vladimir N Makarov writes: > On 09/06/2016 11:22 AM, Matthew Fortune wrote: > > There is an implementation that optimises a single set but not one for > > a REG_EQUAL. Do you have any recollection of this code and do you > > think there was a reason you didn't implement the

Re: [RFC,PATCH] Using equivalences to help eliminate_regs_in_insn

On 09/06/2016 11:22 AM, Matthew Fortune wrote: There is an implementation that optimises a single set but not one for a REG_EQUAL. Do you have any recollection of this code and do you think there was a reason you didn't implement the REG_EQUAL case? Either way any advice on my approach is