On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 04:50:33PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 05:20:31PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
I did some timing tests to compare the new PowerPC IEEE 128-bit results to
the
current implementation of long double using the IBM extended format.
The
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 04:50:33PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 05:20:31PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
I did some timing tests to compare the new PowerPC IEEE 128-bit results to
the
current implementation of long double using the IBM extended format.
The
I did some timing tests to compare the new PowerPC IEEE 128-bit results to the
current implementation of long double using the IBM extended format.
The test consisted a short loop doing the operation over arrays of 1,024
elements, reading in two values, doing the operation, and then storing it
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 05:20:31PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
I did some timing tests to compare the new PowerPC IEEE 128-bit results to the
current implementation of long double using the IBM extended format.
The test consisted a short loop doing the operation over arrays of 1,024