On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 08:43:29AM +0100, Mark Eggleston wrote:
> Please find attached patch for additional test cases. Are these sufficient?
> If so, OK to commit?
>
> Change log:
>
> Mark Eggleston
>
> * gfortran.dg/auto_in_equiv_3.f90: New test.
> * gfortran.dg/auto_in_equiv_4.f9
On 04/10/2019 11:39, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 03:31:53PM +0100, Mark Eggleston wrote:
It was there because the code base has -fno-automatic for procedures are
that aren't recursive and the -frecursive was used because the recursive
routines don't have the recursive keyword.
On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 02:36:55PM +0100, Mark Eggleston wrote:
> ChangeLog:
>
> Mark Eggleston
>
> * gfortran.dg/auto_in_equiv_1.f90: Deleted.
> * gfortran.dg/auto_in_equiv_2.f90: Deleted.
> * gfortran.dg/auto_in_equiv_3.f90: Deleted.
> * gfortran.dg/automatics_in_equivalenc
On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 02:36:55PM +0100, Mark Eggleston wrote:
> Please find attached a patch to replace the test cases for "Automatic in
> equivalence".
>
> ChangeLog:
>
> Mark Eggleston
>
> * gfortran.dg/auto_in_equiv_1.f90: Deleted.
> * gfortran.dg/auto_in_equiv_2.f90: Delet
