Hi Vladimir,
I'm sorry I failed to give a proper amount of context in that email. You already
approved that patch for trunk one or two months ago and I was just replying to
your approval to ask if you are now ok to commit it to gcc-6-branch.
I've committed it now then since it has been on tru
On 07/08/2016 11:07 AM, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
Hi,
While investigating the root cause a testsuite regression for the
ARM/embedded-5-branch GCC in gcc.dg/vect/slp-perm-5.c, we found that the bug
seems to also affect trunk. The bug manifests itself as an ICE in cselib due to
a parallel insn wi
Hi Vladimir & release managers,
The patch applies cleanly to gcc-6-branch. Ok to backport?
Best regards,
Thomas
On 14/07/16 17:25, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
On 07/08/2016 11:07 AM, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
Hi,
While investigating the root cause a testsuite regression for the
ARM/embedded-5-br
On 07/08/2016 11:07 AM, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
Hi,
While investigating the root cause a testsuite regression for the
ARM/embedded-5-branch GCC in gcc.dg/vect/slp-perm-5.c, we found that the bug
seems to also affect trunk. The bug manifests itself as an ICE in cselib due to
a parallel insn with
On Thursday 14 July 2016 10:32:48 Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
> On Friday 08 July 2016 09:05:55 Mike Stump wrote:
> > On Jul 8, 2016, at 8:07 AM, Thomas Preudhomme
>
> wrote:
> > > While investigating the root cause a testsuite regression for the
> > > ARM/embedded-5-branch GCC in gcc.dg/vect/slp-pe
On Friday 08 July 2016 09:05:55 Mike Stump wrote:
> On Jul 8, 2016, at 8:07 AM, Thomas Preudhomme
wrote:
> > While investigating the root cause a testsuite regression for the
> > ARM/embedded-5-branch GCC in gcc.dg/vect/slp-perm-5.c, we found that the
> > bug seems to also affect trunk.
>
> Hum.
On Jul 8, 2016, at 8:07 AM, Thomas Preudhomme
wrote:
> While investigating the root cause a testsuite regression for the
> ARM/embedded-5-branch GCC in gcc.dg/vect/slp-perm-5.c, we found that the bug
> seems to also affect trunk.
Hum... If in 6.x, and safe to back port to 6, a back port would