On 07/12/2018 01:34 PM, Robin Dapp wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Please skip '+ && !opts->x_optimize_size)'. I'm attaching patch
>> that will
>> set opts->x_flag_align_functions to 0 for -Os. It's part of another batch
>> alignment patches I'm preparing.
>
> done in the attached version and added some t
Hi,
> Please skip '+ && !opts->x_optimize_size)'. I'm attaching patch
> that will
> set opts->x_flag_align_functions to 0 for -Os. It's part of another batch
> alignment patches I'm preparing.
done in the attached version and added some tests (which do not all fail
without the patch as we ca
On 07/11/2018 05:40 PM, Robin Dapp wrote:
Hi,
the following patch increases the default function alignment to 16
bytes. This helps get rid of some unwanted performance effects.
I'm unsure whether or when it's necessary to implement
OVERRIDE_OPTIONS_AFTER_CHANGE.
Hi.
Yes, it's how that shoul
