Re: [PATCH] Don't peel extra copy of loop in unroller for loops with exit at end

On 10/14/2016 10:29 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote: >>> >> This patch bumps the iteration count by 1 for loops with the exit at the >>> >> end so that it represents the number of times the loop body is executed, >>> >> and therefore removes the need to always execute that first peeled copy. >>> >>

Re: [PATCH] Don't peel extra copy of loop in unroller for loops with exit at end

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 8:28 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Pat Haugen > wrote: >> I noticed the loop unroller peels an extra copy of the loop before it enters >> the switch block code to round the iteration count to

Re: [PATCH] Don't peel extra copy of loop in unroller for loops with exit at end

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Pat Haugen wrote: > I noticed the loop unroller peels an extra copy of the loop before it enters > the switch block code to round the iteration count to a multiple of the > unroll factor. This peeled copy is only needed for the case

Re: [PATCH] Don't peel extra copy of loop in unroller for loops with exit at end

On 09/22/2016 01:10 PM, Pat Haugen wrote: I noticed the loop unroller peels an extra copy of the loop before it enters the switch block code to round the iteration count to a multiple of the unroll factor. This peeled copy is only needed for the case where the exit test is at the beginning of

PING Re: [PATCH] Don't peel extra copy of loop in unroller for loops with exit at end

Ping for the following patch https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-09/msg01612.html -Pat