On 12/01/2016 05:49 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Okay, thanks for the clarification. One other question though.
Why would the probability be near zero? In the absence of any
hints the expression 2 != sprintf(d, "%i", 12) should have
a very high probability of being true, near 100% in fact.
I ask be
On 12/01/2016 09:49 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Okay, thanks for the clarification. One other question though.
Why would the probability be near zero? In the absence of any
hints the expression 2 != sprintf(d, "%i", 12) should have
a very high probability of being true, near 100% in fact.
I ask be
Okay, thanks for the clarification. One other question though.
Why would the probability be near zero? In the absence of any
hints the expression 2 != sprintf(d, "%i", 12) should have
a very high probability of being true, near 100% in fact.
I ask because the test I referenced tries to verify t
On 12/01/2016 02:48 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 11/30/2016 11:46 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 11/24/2016 05:59 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 11/24/2016 09:29 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
Please guard with ! TDF_GIMPLE, otherwise the output will not be
parseable
with the GIMPLE FE.
RIchard.
Done and
On 11/30/2016 11:46 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 11/24/2016 05:59 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 11/24/2016 09:29 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
Please guard with ! TDF_GIMPLE, otherwise the output will not be parseable
with the GIMPLE FE.
RIchard.
Done and verified that and it provides equal dumps for
On 11/24/2016 05:59 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 11/24/2016 09:29 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
Please guard with ! TDF_GIMPLE, otherwise the output will not be parseable
with the GIMPLE FE.
RIchard.
Done and verified that and it provides equal dumps for -fdump*-gimple.
Installed as r242837.
Hi M
On 11/24/2016 09:29 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> Please guard with ! TDF_GIMPLE, otherwise the output will not be parseable
> with the GIMPLE FE.
>
> RIchard.
Done and verified that and it provides equal dumps for -fdump*-gimple.
Installed as r242837.
Thanks for review.
Martin
>From af3fffab592e5
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> > LGTM. While I've often found a way to get this stuff when looking at
>> > probability updating code, having it in the standard dumps seems like a
>> > good
>> > enhancement.
>>
>> Please guard with ! TDF_GIMPLE, otherwise the output will
> > LGTM. While I've often found a way to get this stuff when looking at
> > probability updating code, having it in the standard dumps seems like a good
> > enhancement.
>
> Please guard with ! TDF_GIMPLE, otherwise the output will not be parseable
> with the GIMPLE FE.
Since gimple FE builds C
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 10:36 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 11/11/2016 06:59 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>>
>> Hello.
>>
>> I spent quite time during this stage1 playing with predictors and we found
>> with Honza multiple situations where a prediction was oddly calculated.
>> Thus, we're suggesting to enha
On 11/11/2016 06:59 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
Hello.
I spent quite time during this stage1 playing with predictors and we found
with Honza multiple situations where a prediction was oddly calculated.
Thus, we're suggesting to enhance default dump format to show BB frequencies
and edge probabilitie
11 matches
Mail list logo
