Re: [PATCH] Fix PR18589

2012-04-12 Thread Richard Guenther
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 3:49 PM, William J. Schmidt wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: On Thu, 2012-04-05 at 11:23 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote: On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:15 PM, William J. Schmidt wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: Unfortunately this seems to be necessary if I name the two

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR18589

2012-04-12 Thread H.J. Lu
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 6:49 AM, William J. Schmidt wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: On Thu, 2012-04-05 at 11:23 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote: On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:15 PM, William J. Schmidt wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: Unfortunately this seems to be necessary if I name the two

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR18589

2012-04-12 Thread William J. Schmidt
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 09:50 -0700, H.J. Lu wrote: On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 6:49 AM, William J. Schmidt wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: On Thu, 2012-04-05 at 11:23 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote: On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:15 PM, William J. Schmidt wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR18589

2012-04-12 Thread William J. Schmidt
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 09:50 -0700, H.J. Lu wrote: On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 6:49 AM, William J. Schmidt wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: On Thu, 2012-04-05 at 11:23 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote: On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:15 PM, William J. Schmidt wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR18589

2012-04-05 Thread Richard Guenther
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:15 PM, William J. Schmidt wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 15:08 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote: On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 2:35 PM, William J. Schmidt wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 13:35 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR18589

2012-04-05 Thread William J. Schmidt
On Thu, 2012-04-05 at 11:23 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote: On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:15 PM, William J. Schmidt wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: Unfortunately this seems to be necessary if I name the two passes reassoc1 and reassoc2. If I try to name both of them reassoc I get failures

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR18589

2012-04-04 Thread Richard Guenther
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:25 PM, William J. Schmidt wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 15:57 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote: On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:49 PM, William J. Schmidt wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: Hi, This is a re-post of the patch I posted for

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR18589

2012-04-04 Thread William J. Schmidt
On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 13:35 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote: On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:25 PM, William J. Schmidt wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 15:57 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote: On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:49 PM, William J. Schmidt wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR18589

2012-04-04 Thread Richard Guenther
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 2:35 PM, William J. Schmidt wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 13:35 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote: On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:25 PM, William J. Schmidt wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 15:57 +0200, Richard Guenther

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR18589

2012-04-04 Thread William J. Schmidt
On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 15:08 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote: On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 2:35 PM, William J. Schmidt wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 13:35 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote: On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:25 PM, William J. Schmidt wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR18589

2012-04-04 Thread William J. Schmidt
On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 13:35 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote: On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:25 PM, William J. Schmidt wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: Hi Richard, I've revised my patch along these lines; see the new version below. While testing it I realized I could do a better job of

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR18589

2012-04-03 Thread William J. Schmidt
On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 15:57 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote: On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:49 PM, William J. Schmidt wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: Hi, This is a re-post of the patch I posted for comments in January to address http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18589. The patch

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR18589

2012-03-28 Thread Richard Guenther
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:49 PM, William J. Schmidt wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: Hi, This is a re-post of the patch I posted for comments in January to address http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18589.  The patch modifies reassociation to expose repeated factors from

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR18589

2012-03-28 Thread William J. Schmidt
On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 15:57 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote: On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:49 PM, William J. Schmidt wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: Hi, This is a re-post of the patch I posted for comments in January to address http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18589. The patch