Re: [PATCH] Fix gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-[345].c testcases

2017-01-16 Thread Christophe Lyon
On 16 January 2017 at 10:43, Richard Biener wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jan 2017, Christophe Lyon wrote: > >> On 13 January 2017 at 12:16, Bin.Cheng wrote: >> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Richard Biener wrote: >> >> >> >> The following is an attempt to change those testcases to be less dependent >

Re: [PATCH] Fix gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-[345].c testcases

2017-01-16 Thread Rainer Orth
Hi Richard, > The following is an attempt to change those testcases to be less dependent > on previous passes. The original motivation of the testcases seems to be > testing SCEV capabilities and in turn IVOPTs decisions, thus the testcases > are changed to check the IVO dump, use the GIMPLE FE f

Re: [PATCH] Fix gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-[345].c testcases

2017-01-16 Thread Richard Biener
On Mon, 16 Jan 2017, Christophe Lyon wrote: > On 13 January 2017 at 12:16, Bin.Cheng wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > >> > >> The following is an attempt to change those testcases to be less dependent > >> on previous passes. The original motivation of the tes

Re: [PATCH] Fix gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-[345].c testcases

2017-01-16 Thread Christophe Lyon
On 13 January 2017 at 12:16, Bin.Cheng wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Richard Biener wrote: >> >> The following is an attempt to change those testcases to be less dependent >> on previous passes. The original motivation of the testcases seems to be >> testing SCEV capabilities and in

Re: [PATCH] Fix gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-[345].c testcases

2017-01-13 Thread Bin.Cheng
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > > The following is an attempt to change those testcases to be less dependent > on previous passes. The original motivation of the testcases seems to be > testing SCEV capabilities and in turn IVOPTs decisions, thus the testcases > are chang