On 4/15/19 9:27 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 8:48 AM Martin Liška wrote:
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>> Apparently, there's one another PR:
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90083
>>
>> May I backport the patch to GCC-8 branch?
>
> Hmm, it isn't a regression, right? But it
On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 8:48 AM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> Apparently, there's one another PR:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90083
>
> May I backport the patch to GCC-8 branch?
Hmm, it isn't a regression, right? But it only
affects multi-versioning, so yes, go ahead.
Might
Hi.
Apparently, there's one another PR:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90083
May I backport the patch to GCC-8 branch?
Thanks,
Martin
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 6:25 AM H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 4:51 AM Richard Biener
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:21 PM Martin Liška wrote:
> > >
> > > On 1/16/19 1:06 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 10:20 AM Martin Liška wrote:
> > > >>
>
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 4:51 AM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:21 PM Martin Liška wrote:
> >
> > On 1/16/19 1:06 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 10:20 AM Martin Liška wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi.
> > >>
> > >> The patch is about resetting TYPE_MODE of
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:21 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 1/16/19 1:06 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 10:20 AM Martin Liška wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi.
> >>
> >> The patch is about resetting TYPE_MODE of vector types. This is problematic
> >> when an inlining among different
On 1/16/19 1:06 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 10:20 AM Martin Liška wrote:
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>> The patch is about resetting TYPE_MODE of vector types. This is problematic
>> when an inlining among different ISAs happen. Then we end up with a different
>> mode than when it's
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 10:20 AM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> The patch is about resetting TYPE_MODE of vector types. This is problematic
> when an inlining among different ISAs happen. Then we end up with a different
> mode than when it's expected from debug info.
>
> When creating a new
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 12:59 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 12:50:23PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > I guess so. There's not much we can do about this other than making
> > DECL_MODE dynamic the same way as TYPE_MODE. I still believe
> > this is the wrong direction and
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 12:50:23PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> I guess so. There's not much we can do about this other than making
> DECL_MODE dynamic the same way as TYPE_MODE. I still believe
> this is the wrong direction and instead RTL expansion should properly
> adjust DECL_RTL and
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 10:26 AM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> And there's patch with Richi's validation check that he provided.
> It fails on following 2 tests in test-suite:
>
> $ ./xgcc -B.
> /home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr68674.c
> DECL_MODE BLK vs TYPE_MODE V8SI
And there's patch with Richi's validation check that he provided.
It fails on following 2 tests in test-suite:
$ ./xgcc -B.
/home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr68674.c
DECL_MODE BLK vs TYPE_MODE V8SI [V8SI]: a
...
$ ./xgcc -B.
12 matches
Mail list logo