Hi!
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 20:55:49 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 06:07:17PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > On 11.04.2018 12:31, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > As discussed, using --as-needed and --no-as-needed is dangerous, because
> > > it results in --no-as-needed even for
On 04/11/2018 04:31 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As discussed, using --as-needed and --no-as-needed is dangerous, because
> it results in --no-as-needed even for libraries after -lgcc_s, even when the
> default is --as-needed or --as-needed has been specified earlier on the
> command line.
On 11.04.2018 20:55, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 06:07:17PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> On 11.04.2018 12:31, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> As discussed, using --as-needed and --no-as-needed is dangerous, because
>>> it results in --no-as-needed even for libraries
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 06:07:17PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 11.04.2018 12:31, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > As discussed, using --as-needed and --no-as-needed is dangerous, because
> > it results in --no-as-needed even for libraries after -lgcc_s, even when the
> > default is
On 11.04.2018 12:31, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As discussed, using --as-needed and --no-as-needed is dangerous, because
> it results in --no-as-needed even for libraries after -lgcc_s, even when the
> default is --as-needed or --as-needed has been specified earlier on the
> command line.
>