Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com writes:
On 04/25/2012 11:31 AM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
+#define EXPANSION_POINT_LOCATION_FILE(LOC) \
+ ((expand_location_to_expansion_point (LOC)).file)
+#define EXPANSION_POINT_LOCATION_LINE(LOC) \
+ ((expand_location_to_expansion_point
On 04/25/2012 11:31 AM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
+#define EXPANSION_POINT_LOCATION_FILE(LOC) \
+ ((expand_location_to_expansion_point (LOC)).file)
+#define EXPANSION_POINT_LOCATION_LINE(LOC) \
+ ((expand_location_to_expansion_point (LOC)).line)
+#define
On 04/10/2012 03:49 PM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
Apparently, quite some places in the compiler (like the C/C++
preprocessor, the debug info machinery) expect expand_location to
resolve to locations that are in the main source file, even if the
token at stake comes from a macro that was defined
I have re-based my tree on top of a recent tree that incorporates the
changes for caret diagnostics and I had to update this patch
accordingly. Here is its new version on trunk of today. It basically
updates the new diagnostic_show_locus function to point to spelling
locations.
The patch does
On 04/10/2012 03:49 PM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
Apparently, quite some places in the compiler (like the C/C++
preprocessor, the debug info machinery) expect expand_location to
resolve to locations that are in the main source file, even if the
token at stake comes from a macro that was defined in a
