On 06/24/2018 05:19 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2018, Joseph Myers wrote:
>> These two patches are OK, please commit.
>
> I created ChangeLog entries and committed both patches (one a few
> days ago, the second just now).
>
> Thank you, Maya! If you have any further clean-ups, I
On Tue, 19 Jun 2018, Joseph Myers wrote:
> These two patches are OK, please commit.
I created ChangeLog entries and committed both patches (one a few
days ago, the second just now).
Thank you, Maya! If you have any further clean-ups, I'll be happy
to help by committing them (once approved).
>
On Tue, 19 Jun 2018, co...@sdf.org wrote:
> Hi! I have no commit access.
> Can someone commit it?
I'll take care.
Gerald
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 03:31:55PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Feb 2018, Maya Rashish wrote:
>
> > Of the currently supported BSDs:
> > - FreeBSD, doesn't have ansi.h or define _MACHINE_ANSI_H anywhere
> > in its other headers since the long-gone 5.x release.
> > - OpenBSD, DragonflyBSD
On Sun, 4 Feb 2018, Maya Rashish wrote:
> Of the currently supported BSDs:
> - FreeBSD, doesn't have ansi.h or define _MACHINE_ANSI_H anywhere
> in its other headers since the long-gone 5.x release.
> - OpenBSD, DragonflyBSD don't have ansi.h either.
> - NetBSD, sole remaining with ansi.h
>
> Rep
On 01.03.2018 03:43, co...@sdf.org wrote:
> hi gcc-patches,
>
> as part of pinging, i'll explain the story of this patch.
>
> I want to make sure all netbsd archs work with upstream gcc.
> in this case, netbsd/arm's EABI support.
> I try to break up my changes into digestible chunks that are rati
hi gcc-patches,
as part of pinging, i'll explain the story of this patch.
I want to make sure all netbsd archs work with upstream gcc.
in this case, netbsd/arm's EABI support.
I try to break up my changes into digestible chunks that are rational,
which is why this change came first.
building net
ping
they're good patches. ask questions. I have more.
ping, let me know if there is anything wrong with it.