On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 03:54:43PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 10/18/2016 03:54 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
> >
> > I do really prefer reading code where variables are declared at first
> > use
>
> In general, so do I, but in this case it's one variable out of a whole
> bunch, which makes
On 10/18/2016 03:54 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
I do really prefer reading code where variables are declared at first
use
In general, so do I, but in this case it's one variable out of a whole
bunch, which makes the entire thing look a little inconsistent.
Bernd
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 01:18:42PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 10/17/2016 09:46 PM, tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org wrote:
> > {
> > - rtx r0, r16, eqv, tga, tp, insn, dest, seq;
> > + rtx r0, r16, eqv, tga, tp, dest, seq;
> > + rtx_insn *insn;
> >
> >switch
On 10/17/2016 09:46 PM, tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org wrote:
{
- rtx r0, r16, eqv, tga, tp, insn, dest, seq;
+ rtx r0, r16, eqv, tga, tp, dest, seq;
+ rtx_insn *insn;
switch (tls_symbolic_operand_type (x))
{
@@ -1025,66 +1026,70 @@ alpha_legitimize_address_1 (rtx
