Hi Christophe,
I committed the wrong test :-( Corrected r258128.
Many thanks
Paul
On 2 March 2018 at 08:38, Paul Richard Thomas
wrote:
> Hi Christophe,
>
> I was not aware. Thanks for letting me know.
>
> It's wierd that there is no error message or an ICE. Previously, an
> ICE would occur i
By golly you are right!
Je vous en remercie :-)
Paul
On 2 March 2018 at 08:41, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> On 2 March 2018 at 09:38, Paul Richard Thomas
> wrote:
>> Hi Christophe,
>>
>> I was not aware. Thanks for letting me know.
>>
>> It's wierd that there is no error message or an ICE. Previo
On 2 March 2018 at 09:38, Paul Richard Thomas
wrote:
> Hi Christophe,
>
> I was not aware. Thanks for letting me know.
>
> It's wierd that there is no error message or an ICE. Previously, an
> ICE would occur instead of the intended error message.
>
> I do not have access to either targets. Would
Hi Christophe,
I was not aware. Thanks for letting me know.
It's wierd that there is no error message or an ICE. Previously, an
ICE would occur instead of the intended error message.
I do not have access to either targets. Would you be so kind as to run
coarray_47.f90 separately to see what happ
On 1 March 2018 at 14:28, Paul Richard Thomas
wrote:
> Committed as 'obvious' in revision 258098.
>
> Paul
>
> 2018-03-01 Paul Thomas
>
> PR fortran/84219
> * target-memory.c (gfc_interpret_derived): Assert that BT_VOID
> components are caf tokens.
> (gfc_target_interpret_expr): Treat BT_VOID e