On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 11:57:18AM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > Logically, the target structure should be for target-specific rtl.
> > Target-independent rtl like constants, (cc0), (pc), etc., should be
> > shared between targets. It seems a shame if GC inefficiencies
> > force us to use a d
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Richard Guenther writes:
>> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Richard Sandiford
>> wrote:
>>> Jakub Jelinek writes:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 09:52:51AM +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> This patch restores x86_64-linux-gnu boots
Richard Guenther writes:
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>> Jakub Jelinek writes:
>>> On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 09:52:51AM +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
This patch restores x86_64-linux-gnu bootstrap after my patch for 52372.
Applied as obvious.
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Jakub Jelinek writes:
>> On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 09:52:51AM +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>>> This patch restores x86_64-linux-gnu bootstrap after my patch for 52372.
>>> Applied as obvious.
>>>
>>> Sorry for the breakage.
>>
>> Was it
Jakub Jelinek writes:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 09:52:51AM +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> This patch restores x86_64-linux-gnu bootstrap after my patch for 52372.
>> Applied as obvious.
>>
>> Sorry for the breakage.
>
> Was it really necessary to move these out of the global rtx array?
> Now
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 09:52:51AM +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> This patch restores x86_64-linux-gnu bootstrap after my patch for 52372.
> Applied as obvious.
>
> Sorry for the breakage.
Was it really necessary to move these out of the global rtx array?
Now you completely unnecessarily have
