On Mar 8, 2015, at 10:38 AM, Iain Sandoe i...@codesourcery.com wrote:
+Ian
+ ping
So, all the darwinness of the patch looks fine to me. One maintainer down,
just need libiberty approval.
If the work becomes too bothersome, the comment out the line and say, # does’t
work with libcc1 approach
+Ian
+ ping
On 11 Feb 2015, at 14:37, Iain Sandoe wrote:
Hi Jeff,
On 9 Feb 2015, at 14:47, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 02/01/15 09:42, Iain Sandoe wrote:
This is a GCC5 bootstrap regression on 32bit Darwin hosts ( I can raise a
PR if that is considered necessary).
Has this
Iain Sandoe i...@codesourcery.com writes:
+Ian
+ ping
The patch is missing the change to maint-tool to generate the
rules at the bottom of libiberty/Makefile.in.
Right now the libiberty Makefile does not require GNU make, and it's not
clear to me that we want to push that dependency onto all
Hi Jeff,
On 9 Feb 2015, at 14:47, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 02/01/15 09:42, Iain Sandoe wrote:
This is a GCC5 bootstrap regression on 32bit Darwin hosts ( I can raise a PR
if that is considered necessary).
Has this been addressed or is it still pending?
I believe it's still
On 02/01/15 09:42, Iain Sandoe wrote:
This is a GCC5 bootstrap regression on 32bit Darwin hosts ( I can raise a PR if
that is considered necessary).
Has this been addressed or is it still pending?
In fact it is not libcc1, but libiberty that is the cause -
On 26 Jan 2015, at 14:13,
This is a GCC5 bootstrap regression on 32bit Darwin hosts ( I can raise a PR if
that is considered necessary).
In fact it is not libcc1, but libiberty that is the cause -
On 26 Jan 2015, at 14:13, Rainer Orth wrote:
FX fxcoud...@gmail.com writes:
The default BOOT_CFLAGS are: -O2 -g
FX fxcoud...@gmail.com writes:
The default BOOT_CFLAGS are: -O2 -g -mdynamic-no-pic
the libiberty pic build appends: -fno-common (and not even -fPIC) [NB
-fPIC _won't_ override -mdynamic-no-pic, so that's not a simple way out]
This means that the PIC library is being built with non-pic
On 26 Jan 2015, at 14:13, Rainer Orth wrote:
FX fxcoud...@gmail.com writes:
The default BOOT_CFLAGS are: -O2 -g -mdynamic-no-pic
the libiberty pic build appends: -fno-common (and not even -fPIC) [NB
-fPIC _won't_ override -mdynamic-no-pic, so that's not a simple way out]
This means that
On 05/12/2014 23:47, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 11:34:28PM +0100, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
As I've tried to explain, that is IMHO wrong though.
If what you are after is the -B stuff too, then perhaps:
...
Sorry but it does not work:
Sorry, make that (just removed 4x
This was for x86_64-apple-darwin14. The patch also works for
x86_64-apple-darwin10.
Dominique
Le 6 déc. 2014 à 01:49, Dominique d'Humières domi...@lps.ens.fr a écrit :
Bootstrap just finished with the patch.
Thanks,
Dominique
Hi Jeff,
On 5 Dec 2014, at 22:40, Jeff Law wrote:
On 12/05/14 15:34, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
As I've tried to explain, that is IMHO wrong though.
If what you are after is the -B stuff too, then perhaps:
...
Sorry but it does not work:
BTW, thanks for working with Jakub on this. We're
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 01:06:45AM +0100, FX wrote:
tl;dr: One question to build maintainers, and one patch submitted to toplevel
configure.ac
---
I’m looked into the issue some more, and am comparing two builds of trunk
(exact same source), one configured with system
...
Can you please test it on Darwin (or whatever other target has similar
issues with bootstrapping libcc1)?
2014-12-05 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
...
The patch does not work for x86_64-apple-darwin14.0.0. However the following
patch does:
--- ../_clean/Makefile.in 2014-11-26
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 08:11:53PM +0100, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
...
Can you please test it on Darwin (or whatever other target has similar
issues with bootstrapping libcc1)?
2014-12-05 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
...
The patch does not work for x86_64-apple-darwin14.0.0.
As I've tried to explain, that is IMHO wrong though.
If what you are after is the -B stuff too, then perhaps:
...
Sorry but it does not work:
true DO=all multi-do # make
make[4]: Leaving directory '/opt/gcc/build_w/libbacktrace'
make[3]: Leaving directory '/opt/gcc/build_w/libbacktrace'
On 12/05/14 15:34, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
As I've tried to explain, that is IMHO wrong though.
If what you are after is the -B stuff too, then perhaps:
...
Sorry but it does not work:
BTW, thanks for working with Jakub on this. We're going to be getting a
Darwin box for Jakub and other
On 05/12/14 22:40, Jeff Law wrote:
On 12/05/14 15:34, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
As I've tried to explain, that is IMHO wrong though.
If what you are after is the -B stuff too, then perhaps:
...
Sorry but it does not work:
BTW, thanks for working with Jakub on this. We're going to be
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 11:34:28PM +0100, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
As I've tried to explain, that is IMHO wrong though.
If what you are after is the -B stuff too, then perhaps:
...
Sorry but it does not work:
Sorry, make that (just removed 4x ' in each file):
2014-12-05 Jakub Jelinek
Bootstrap just finished with the patch.
Thanks,
Dominique
Le 5 déc. 2014 à 23:47, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com a écrit :
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 11:34:28PM +0100, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
As I've tried to explain, that is IMHO wrong though.
If what you are after is the -B stuff too,
10-days ping
This restores bootstrap on a secondary target, target maintainer is OK with it.
I think I need build maintainers approval, so please review.
when the freshly built g++ is used, we need to pass the appropriate -B
options. As I understand it, the appropriate place for that is in
FX fxcoud...@gmail.com writes:
10-days ping
This restores bootstrap on a secondary target, target maintainer is OK with
it. I think I need build maintainers approval, so please review.
While in my testing, 64-bit Mac OS X 10.10.1 (x86_64-apple-darwin14.0.0)
now bootstraps, but 32-bit
While in my testing, 64-bit Mac OS X 10.10.1 (x86_64-apple-darwin14.0.0)
now bootstraps, but 32-bit (i386-apple-darwin14.0.0) does not:
Is it due to my patch, or pre-existing bootstrap failure?
How do you configure this 32-bit compiler? target/build/host/CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS/etc
FX
Hi Rainer,
On 4 Dec 2014, at 13:32, Rainer Orth wrote:
FX fxcoud...@gmail.com writes:
10-days ping
This restores bootstrap on a secondary target, target maintainer is OK with
it. I think I need build maintainers approval, so please review.
While in my testing, 64-bit Mac OS X 10.10.1
FX fxcoud...@gmail.com writes:
While in my testing, 64-bit Mac OS X 10.10.1 (x86_64-apple-darwin14.0.0)
now bootstraps, but 32-bit (i386-apple-darwin14.0.0) does not:
Is it due to my patch, or pre-existing bootstrap failure?
I can't tell: before your patch, 32-bit bootstrap was broken due to
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Iain Sandoe i...@codesourcery.com wrote:
Hi Rainer,
On 4 Dec 2014, at 13:32, Rainer Orth wrote:
FX fxcoud...@gmail.com writes:
10-days ping
This restores bootstrap on a
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Iain Sandoe i...@codesourcery.com wrote:
Hi Rainer,
On 4 Dec 2014, at 13:32, Rainer Orth wrote:
The default BOOT_CFLAGS are: -O2 -g -mdynamic-no-pic
the libiberty pic build appends: -fno-common (and not even -fPIC) [NB -fPIC
_won't_ override -mdynamic-no-pic, so that's not a simple way out]
This means that the PIC library is being built with non-pic relocs.
config/mh-darwin says that
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 2:52 PM, FX fxcoud...@gmail.com wrote:
The default BOOT_CFLAGS are: -O2 -g -mdynamic-no-pic
the libiberty pic build appends: -fno-common (and not even -fPIC) [NB -fPIC
_won't_ override -mdynamic-no-pic, so that's not a simple way out]
This means that the PIC library is
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Iain Sandoe i...@codesourcery.com wrote:
Hi Rainer,
On 4 Dec 2014, at 13:32, Rainer Orth wrote:
FX fxcoud...@gmail.com writes:
10-days ping
This restores bootstrap on a secondary target, target maintainer is OK with
it. I think I need build maintainers
Can you try adding it as
T_CFLAGS += -mdynamic-no-pic
in gcc/config/t-tarwin instead?
Nope, doing so fails to link libgcc_s.dylib:
/Users/fx/devel/gcc/i/./gcc/xgcc -B/Users/fx/devel/gcc/i/./gcc/
-B/Users/fx/devel/gcc/i2/i386-apple-darwin14.0.0/bin/
On 4 Dec 2014, at 15:24, FX wrote:
Can you try adding it as
T_CFLAGS += -mdynamic-no-pic
in gcc/config/t-tarwin instead?
-mdynamic-no-pic should be used to build *host* executable stuff for m32 darwin.
It is not suitable for building shared libraries (hence the problem with
building
On Nov 23, 2014, at 4:06 PM, FX fxcoud...@gmail.com wrote:
One question to build maintainers, and one patch submitted to top-level
configure.ac
So, not sure who wants to review this. From the darwin perspective, Ok.
On 25/11/14 20:37, Mike Stump wrote:
On Nov 23, 2014, at 4:06 PM, FX fxcoud...@gmail.com wrote:
One question to build maintainers, and one patch submitted to top-level
configure.ac
So, not sure who wants to review this. From the darwin perspective, Ok.
I mean from my limited viewpoint it
On 11/25/14 13:57, Phil Muldoon wrote:
On 25/11/14 20:37, Mike Stump wrote:
On Nov 23, 2014, at 4:06 PM, FX fxcoud...@gmail.com wrote:
One question to build maintainers, and one patch submitted to top-level
configure.ac
So, not sure who wants to review this. From the darwin perspective,
34 matches
Mail list logo
