On 31 Aug 2013, at 22:42, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com writes:
| This patch fixes that by introducing GXX_LINK which is GCC_LINK except
| that CXX (e.g. xg++) instead of CC (e.g. xgcc) is invoked.
|
| Eric, are there other executables that need to be
It seems the patch needs a couple of minor amendments to work with Darwin -
and I've added an updated version to the PR which passes bootstrap and make
check-ada on x86_64-darwin12. Iain
Thanks, here is the final patch I just installed.
2013-09-01 Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com
Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com writes:
| It seems the patch needs a couple of minor amendments to work with Darwin -
| and I've added an updated version to the PR which passes bootstrap and make
| check-ada on x86_64-darwin12. Iain
|
| Thanks, here is the final patch I just installed.
This patch fixes that by introducing GXX_LINK which is GCC_LINK except
that CXX (e.g. xg++) instead of CC (e.g. xgcc) is invoked.
Eric, are there other executables that need to be linked with GXX_LINK
too but aren't triggered yet?
Yes, all not covered executables linking with TOOLS_LIBS
Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com writes:
| This patch fixes that by introducing GXX_LINK which is GCC_LINK except
| that CXX (e.g. xg++) instead of CC (e.g. xgcc) is invoked.
|
| Eric, are there other executables that need to be linked with GXX_LINK
| too but aren't triggered yet?
|
|
Gabriel Dos Reis g...@axiomatics.org writes:
My earlier patch that formally desclared pretty_printer as polymorphic
uncovered a latent bug in the existing build machinery of the Ada
component. It had been using xgcc to link against C++ source files. It
should use xg++ instead.
This patch
