On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 01:40:53PM +0100, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > 2018-08-13 Marek Polacek
> >
> > PR c++/57891
> > * call.c (struct conversion): Add check_narrowing_const_only.
> > (build_converted_constant_expr): Set check_narrowing and
> > check_narrowing_cons
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 11:24 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 10:14:21PM +1200, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> >> >> > --- gcc/cp/decl.c
>> >> >> > +++ gcc/cp/decl.c
>> >> >> > @@ -9581,7 +9581,7 @@ compute_array_index_type (tree name, tree
>> >> >> > size, tsubst_flags_t complain)
>>
On Tue, 2018-08-14 at 11:02 +1200, Jason Merrill wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2018, 10:24 AM Marek Polacek
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 10:14:21PM +1200, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > >> >> > --- gcc/cp/decl.c
> > > >> >> > +++ gcc/cp/decl.c
> > > >> >> > @@ -9581,7 +9581,7 @@ compute_array
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018, 10:24 AM Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 10:14:21PM +1200, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > >> >> > --- gcc/cp/decl.c
> > >> >> > +++ gcc/cp/decl.c
> > >> >> > @@ -9581,7 +9581,7 @@ compute_array_index_type (tree name, tree
> size, tsubst_flags_t complain)
> > >> >> >
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 10:14:21PM +1200, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >> >> > --- gcc/cp/decl.c
> >> >> > +++ gcc/cp/decl.c
> >> >> > @@ -9581,7 +9581,7 @@ compute_array_index_type (tree name, tree size,
> >> >> > tsubst_flags_t complain)
> >> >> > {
> >> >> >tree folded = cp_fully_fold (s
On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 2:13 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 11:32:24PM +1200, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 8:59 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
>> > On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 12:02:31AM +1000, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> >> > OK -- see the patch below. Now, I'm not craz
On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 11:32:24PM +1200, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 8:59 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 12:02:31AM +1000, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >> > OK -- see the patch below. Now, I'm not crazy about adding another bit
> >> > to struct conversion, but
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 8:59 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 12:02:31AM +1000, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> > OK -- see the patch below. Now, I'm not crazy about adding another bit
>> > to struct conversion, but reusing any of the other bits didn't seem
>> > safe/possible. Maybe it
On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 12:02:31AM +1000, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > OK -- see the patch below. Now, I'm not crazy about adding another bit
> > to struct conversion, but reusing any of the other bits didn't seem
> > safe/possible. Maybe it'll come in handy when dealing with this problem
> > for fun
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 6:49 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 04:27:33PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 3:41 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 2:58 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 12:40:51PM -0400, Jason Merrill w
Ping.
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 04:49:12PM -0400, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 04:27:33PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 3:41 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 2:58 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 12:40:51PM -040
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 04:27:33PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 3:41 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 2:58 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 12:40:51PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 3:58 PM, Marek Polacek
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 4:35 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 03:41:43PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 2:58 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 12:40:51PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 3:58 PM, Marek Polacek w
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 03:41:43PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 2:58 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 12:40:51PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 3:58 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 07:35:15PM -0400, Jaso
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 3:41 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 2:58 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 12:40:51PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 3:58 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
>>> > On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 07:35:15PM -0400, Jason Merrill wr
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 2:58 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 12:40:51PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 3:58 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 07:35:15PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Marek Polacek
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 12:40:51PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 3:58 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 07:35:15PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> >> > This PR complains about us accepting invalid
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 3:58 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 07:35:15PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
>> > This PR complains about us accepting invalid code like
>> >
>> > template struct A {};
>> > A<-1> a;
>> >
>> >
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 07:35:15PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > This PR complains about us accepting invalid code like
> >
> > template struct A {};
> > A<-1> a;
> >
> > Where we should detect the narrowing: [temp.arg.nontype] says
>
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> This PR complains about us accepting invalid code like
>
> template struct A {};
> A<-1> a;
>
> Where we should detect the narrowing: [temp.arg.nontype] says
> "A template-argument for a non-type template-parameter shall be a converted
>
20 matches
Mail list logo
