On 06.04.2018 19:10, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018, Andrey Belevantsev wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> This issue ended up being fixed the way different from described in the PR.
>> We do not want to walk away from the invariant "zero SCHED_TIMES -- insn
>> is not scheduled" even for boo
On Tue, 3 Apr 2018, Andrey Belevantsev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This issue ended up being fixed the way different from described in the PR.
> We do not want to walk away from the invariant "zero SCHED_TIMES -- insn
> is not scheduled" even for bookkeeping copies (testing showed it trips over
> assert
On 03.04.2018 19:02, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018, Andrey Belevantsev wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> This issue ended up being fixed the way different from described in the PR.
>> We do not want to walk away from the invariant "zero SCHED_TIMES -- insn
>> is not scheduled" even for boo
On Tue, 3 Apr 2018, Andrey Belevantsev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This issue ended up being fixed the way different from described in the PR.
> We do not want to walk away from the invariant "zero SCHED_TIMES -- insn
> is not scheduled" even for bookkeeping copies (testing showed it trips over
> assert