On Mon, 12 Sept 2022 at 10:16, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 11:38:58AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 01:27:51PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 11:33:29AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patch
On 3/3/21 1:42 PM, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 21:26 +0100, Ilya Leoshkevich via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 13:02 -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
>>>
>>> On 3/2/21 4:50 PM, Ilya Leoshkevich via Gcc-patches wrote:
Hello,
I would like to ping the follow
On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 21:26 +0100, Ilya Leoshkevich via Gcc-patches
wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 13:02 -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 3/2/21 4:50 PM, Ilya Leoshkevich via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I would like to ping the following patch:
> > >
> > > Add input_modes p
On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 13:02 -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
> On 3/2/21 4:50 PM, Ilya Leoshkevich via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would like to ping the following patch:
> >
> > Add input_modes parameter to TARGET_MD_ASM_ADJUST hook
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-Janu
On 3/2/21 4:50 PM, Ilya Leoshkevich via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to ping the following patch:
>
> Add input_modes parameter to TARGET_MD_ASM_ADJUST hook
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-January/562898.html
>
> It is needed for the following regression fix:
>
>
Greetings yet again,
It would be greatly appreciated if you could look at this patch when you
have a minute.
--Doug
On 6/17/20 2:14 PM, Douglas B Rupp wrote:
Greetings again,
Could you please look at this patch when convenient?
--Doug
On 6/1/20 10:13 AM, Douglas B Rupp wrote:
Greetings,
On 04/12/2018 02:41 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2018, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I'd like to ping the
>>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-03/msg01244.html
>> - PR83157 - improve debug info for x86 setcc peepholes
>>
>> patch. Thanks.
>
> OK for stage1 and backp
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 10:41:22AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2018, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > I'd like to ping the
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-03/msg01244.html
> > - PR83157 - improve debug info for x86 setcc peepholes
> >
> > patch. Thanks.
>
> OK for sta
On Thu, 12 Apr 2018, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'd like to ping the
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-03/msg01244.html
> - PR83157 - improve debug info for x86 setcc peepholes
>
> patch. Thanks.
OK for stage1 and backporting after it soaked there for a while.
I'm too unfamilia
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 12:17:44PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> So this has probably been hashed to death, but just a couple thoughts.
>
> I think realistically one has to look at the entirety of the PARALLEL to
> get any reasonable costing.
>
> Summing the individual components is wrong. Taking the
On 06/29/2017 02:51 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> On 28.06.2017 22:18, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
>> Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>>
>> @@ -5300,6 +5300,9 @@ seq_cost (const rtx_insn *seq, bool spee
>> set = single_set (seq);
>> if (set)
>> cost += set_rtx_cost (set, speed);
>> +
On 28.06.2017 22:18, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
@@ -5300,6 +5300,9 @@ seq_cost (const rtx_insn *seq, bool spee
set = single_set (seq);
if (set)
cost += set_rtx_cost (set, speed);
+ else if (INSN_P (seq)
+ && PARALLEL == GET_CODE (PAT
Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
@@ -5300,6 +5300,9 @@ seq_cost (const rtx_insn *seq, bool spee
set = single_set (seq);
if (set)
cost += set_rtx_cost (set, speed);
+ else if (INSN_P (seq)
+ && PARALLEL == GET_CODE (PATTERN (seq)))
+ cost += insn_rtx_cost (PATT
On 11/23/2015 10:00 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
DWARF changes are OK.
The other changes are in the Ada front-end. Eric approved them offline
already, so I’ve pushed them. By the way, a lot of changes were already
merged by Arnaud Charlet a couple of days ago. Thank you both for the
review!
--
On 08/31/2015 03:26 AM, Pierre-Marie de Rodat wrote:
On 07/25/2015 09:44 PM, Pierre-Marie de Rodat wrote:
This change makes GCC materialize subprogram renamings in Ada as
imported declarations (DW_TAG_imported_declarations). For instance,
procedure Foo renames Bar;
will output:
DW_T
On 29/01/14 17:42, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 23/01/14 08:58, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 16/01/14 18:10, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
The Cortex-A53 and Cortex-A57 cores support the CRC32 and Crypto extensions to
the ARMv8-A architecture. This patch adds that information to their definitions
in a
Ping. The ARM portion of this patch is still awaiting approval.
On 11/08/2011 12:35 PM, Dmitry Plotnikov wrote:
Ping.
On 10/28/2011 12:22 PM, Dmitry Plotnikov wrote:
Here is the patch updated according to recent comments.
2011-10-28 Dmitry Plotnikov
gcc/
* tree-cfg.c (verify_gimple_assign_
On 06/27/2011 07:47 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
Extend TYPE_DECL_IS_STUB trick (1 line):
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-04/msg00683.html
OK.
Emit DW_AT_artificial for types:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-04/msg00700.html
OK.
Fix PR lto/48492 (bis) (1 line):
http://g
18 matches
Mail list logo
