Re: Swap SECTION_EXCLUDE and SECTION_MACH_DEP
Already submitted by gjl in rev. 185259. -Sri. On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com wrote: On 03/12/12 10:26, Sriraman Tallam wrote: Hi Richard, Is this ok for trunk? Asking you because you approved the patch the first time around. Thanks, -Sri. On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote: Please see: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52545 SECTION_EXCLUDE should not take up bits reserved for SECTION_MACH_DEP Patch: PR 52545 * output.h (SECTION_MACH_DEP) (SECTION_EXCLUDE): Swap values. Yes, this patch is ok r~
Re: Swap SECTION_EXCLUDE and SECTION_MACH_DEP
Please see: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52545 SECTION_EXCLUDE should not take up bits reserved for SECTION_MACH_DEP Patch: PR 52545 * output.h (SECTION_MACH_DEP) (SECTION_EXCLUDE): Swap values. Index: output.h === --- output.h(revision 185120) +++ output.h(working copy) @@ -446,8 +446,8 @@ #define SECTION_STYLE_MASK 0x60/* bits used for SECTION_STYLE */ #define SECTION_COMMON 0x80 /* contains common data */ #define SECTION_RELRO 0x100 /* data is readonly after relocation processing */ -#define SECTION_MACH_DEP 0x200 /* subsequent bits reserved for target */ -#define SECTION_EXCLUDE 0x400 /* discarded by the linker */ +#define SECTION_EXCLUDE 0x200 /* discarded by the linker */ +#define SECTION_MACH_DEP 0x400 /* subsequent bits reserved for target */ Ok to submit? Thanks. -Sri. On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote:
