Re: struct siginfo vs. siginfo_t

2012-04-20 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! Sorry for the delay. On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 05:34:30 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor i...@airs.com wrote: Thomas Schwinge tho...@codesourcery.com writes: libgcc/ * config/alpha/linux-unwind.h (alpha_fallback_frame_state): Use siginfo_t instead of struct siginfo. *

Re: struct siginfo vs. siginfo_t

2012-03-27 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! Ping. On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 15:56:04 +0100, I wrote: On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:57:00 -0400, Carlos O'Donell car...@systemhalted.org wrote: On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Thomas Schwinge tho...@codesourcery.com wrote: On 26 Feb 2012 18:17:52 -, drep...@sourceware.org wrote:

Re: struct siginfo vs. siginfo_t

2012-03-27 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Thomas Schwinge tho...@codesourcery.com writes: libgcc/ * config/alpha/linux-unwind.h (alpha_fallback_frame_state): Use siginfo_t instead of struct siginfo. * config/bfin/linux-unwind.h (bfin_fallback_frame_state): Likewise. * config/i386/linux-unwind.h

Re: struct siginfo vs. siginfo_t

2012-03-21 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:57:00 -0400, Carlos O'Donell car...@systemhalted.org wrote: On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Thomas Schwinge tho...@codesourcery.com wrote: On 26 Feb 2012 18:17:52 -, drep...@sourceware.org wrote:

Re: struct siginfo vs. siginfo_t (was: GNU C Library master sources branch, master, updated. glibc-2.15-229-g4efeffc)

2012-03-15 Thread Carlos O'Donell
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Thomas Schwinge tho...@codesourcery.com wrote: Hi! On 26 Feb 2012 18:17:52 -, drep...@sourceware.org wrote: http://sources.redhat.com/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=4efeffc1d583597e4f52985b9747269e47b754e2 commit

Re: struct siginfo vs. siginfo_t (was: GNU C Library master sources branch, master, updated. glibc-2.15-229-g4efeffc)

2012-03-15 Thread H.J. Lu
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Carlos O'Donell car...@systemhalted.org wrote: On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Thomas Schwinge tho...@codesourcery.com wrote: Hi! On 26 Feb 2012 18:17:52 -, drep...@sourceware.org wrote:

Re: struct siginfo vs. siginfo_t (was: GNU C Library master sources branch, master, updated. glibc-2.15-229-g4efeffc)

2012-03-15 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 15 March 2012 11:57:00 Carlos O'Donell wrote: We should be rebuilding *all* of userspace when glibc changes. It would be nice if we setup an OpenEmbedded system to rebuild as much of x86-64 userspace as possible against a new glibc and check for regressions. emerge -e world -mike