Hi Richard
Please let me know if you have any knowledge about compiler used to this
project
I had some info they use gnu compiler before the change name sincerley chris
http://www.samsung.com/global/business/telecommunication-systems/resource/opensource/ip-set-top-box.html
SMT-6010E
On 01/22/2018 01:21 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
There is a different issue with the think itself.
__x86_indirect_thunk_rax:
.LFB2:
.cfi_startproc
call .LIND5
.LIND4:
pause
lfence
jmp .LIND4
.LIND5:
mov %rax, (%rsp)
ret
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 2:23 AM, Milian Wolff wrote:
>
> I was made aware that libbacktrace got support for external debug info with
> [1], great work! I have just synced the latest libbacktrace into heaptrack [2]
> in a local branch and played around with it and noticed
Hi,
As I understand from this
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/ARM-Options.html current master
branch doesn't have support of double-precision FPv5 floating-point
instructions for ARMv8-R (Cortex-r52).
If yes, are there any chances to see them in GCC 8 ?
Alex
Snapshot gcc-7-20180125 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/7-20180125/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 7 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-7
On 01/25/2018 06:38 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 4:21 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> I tried this:
>>
>> struct C {
>> virtual ~C();
>> virtual void f();
>> };
>>
>> void
>> f (C *p)
>> {
>> p->f();
>> p->f();
>> }
>>
>> with r256939 and
You've just sent that to hundreds of people who can't unsubscribe you.
Read the SMTP headers of the email, or go to
https://gcc.gnu.org/lists.html and follow the instructions there.
On 25 January 2018 at 14:56, Jimmy Shen wrote:
> unsubscribe
>
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at
On 25 January 2018 at 12:27, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> On 22.01.2018 16:20, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>
>> On 21 January 2018 at 12:08, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>>>
>>> Jay K schrieb:
extern const int foo = 123;
Why does this warn?
This is a valid portable form, with the
On 22.01.2018 16:20, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 21 January 2018 at 12:08, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Jay K schrieb:
extern const int foo = 123;
Why does this warn?
This is a valid portable form, with the same meaning
across all compilers, and, importantly, portably
to C and C++.
I also
On 25 January 2018 at 12:29, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 25 January 2018 at 12:27, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>> On 22.01.2018 16:20, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>>
>>> On 21 January 2018 at 12:08, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Jay K schrieb:
>
>
> extern const int foo = 123;
>
>
Status
==
The GCC 7 branch is again open for regression and documentation fixes.
Quality Data
Priority # Change from last report
--- ---
P1
P2 164 + 2
P3 22 + 9
P4
The GNU Compiler Collection version 7.3 has been released.
GCC 7.3 is a bug-fix release from the GCC 7 branch
containing important fixes for regressions and serious bugs in
GCC 7.2 with more than 99 bugs fixed since the previous release.
This release includes code generation options to mitigate
Hi
I don't know how to unsubscribe to this.
Thanks.
Vik.
On 25 Jan 2018 9:48 am, "Richard Biener" wrote:
>
> The GNU Compiler Collection version 7.3 has been released.
>
> GCC 7.3 is a bug-fix release from the GCC 7 branch
> containing important fixes for regressions and
On 01/25/2018 02:38 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 12:32 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 01/22/2018 01:21 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
There is a different issue with the think itself.
__x86_indirect_thunk_rax:
.LFB2:
.cfi_startproc
call
Read the SMTP headers of the email, or go to
https://gcc.gnu.org/lists.html and follow the instructions there.
On 25 January 2018 at 10:48, Vikrant Abbott wrote:
> Hi
>
> I don't know how to unsubscribe to this.
>
> Thanks.
> Vik.
>
> On 25 Jan 2018 9:48 am, "Richard
Thank you!
On 25 Jan 2018 1:16 pm, "Jonathan Wakely" wrote:
> Read the SMTP headers of the email, or go to
> https://gcc.gnu.org/lists.html and follow the instructions there.
>
> On 25 January 2018 at 10:48, Vikrant Abbott
> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
>
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 12:32 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 01/22/2018 01:21 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
>> There is a different issue with the think itself.
>>
>> __x86_indirect_thunk_rax:
>> .LFB2:
>> .cfi_startproc
>> call.LIND5
>> .LIND4:
>>
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 4:21 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> I tried this:
>
> struct C {
> virtual ~C();
> virtual void f();
> };
>
> void
> f (C *p)
> {
> p->f();
> p->f();
> }
>
> with r256939 and -mindirect-branch=thunk -O2 on x86-64 GNU/Linux, and got
> this:
>
>
Am 2018-01-12 um 19:45 schrieb Jeff Law:
On 01/12/2018 11:26 AM, Cory Fields wrote:
Quick disclaimer: I'm 100% new to GCC code and the dev process, so
there are bound to be some faulty assumptions below.
I recently worked on a build of gcc, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu ->
x86_64-pc-linux-musl. In order
unsubscribe
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 4:41 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> The GNU Compiler Collection version 7.3 has been released.
>
> GCC 7.3 is a bug-fix release from the GCC 7 branch
> containing important fixes for regressions and serious bugs in
> GCC 7.2 with more than
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84050
Bug ID: 84050
Summary: missing -Warray-bounds accessing a struct array member
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84048
Bug ID: 84048
Summary: [8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/tls/run-ld.c -O0
-pie -fPIE execution test
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84053
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Known to work|
PR tree-optimization/83776 - [6/7/8 Regression] missing
-Warray-bounds indexing past the end of a string literal,
identified a not-so-recent improvement to constant propagation
as the reason for GCC no longer being able to detect out-of-
bounds accesses to string literals. The root cause is that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83776
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84050
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84051
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84057
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84049
Bug ID: 84049
Summary: libgomp.c++/for-[56].C and libgomp.c/for-[56].c take a
long time to run
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56010
--- Comment #9 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #8)
>> This kernel AT_PLATFORM name should strip the '+' off:
>> .platform = "power7+", -> "power7"
>
> We probably should have a -mcpu=power7+, we have power5+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83911
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
Hello Julia,
On 24 Jan 14:00, Koval, Julia wrote:
> Hi,
> Fixed it. Ok for trunk?
>
> gcc/
> * config/i386/avx512bitalgintrin.h (_mm512_bitshuffle_epi64_mask,
> _mm512_mask_bitshuffle_epi64_mask, _mm256_bitshuffle_epi64_mask,
> _mm256_mask_bitshuffle_epi64_mask,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84057
Bug ID: 84057
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in
can_remove_branch_p)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84056
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
Where is the bug? Did you read the documentation for operator[]?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84048
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84048
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
r256935 was okay.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84053
Bug ID: 84053
Summary: missing -Warray-bounds accessing a struct array member
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84055
Bug ID: 84055
Summary: warning: ignoring attributes on template argument
‘cl_uint {aka unsigned int}’ [-Wignored-attributes]
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83981
--- Comment #13 from Daniel Trebbien ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #9)
> Also, if boost::optional had a noexcept move constructor it would work fine.
> This is a boost bug.
>
> The part of the patch addressing PR 83982 seems
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81763
--- Comment #39 from Mike Lothian ---
I can confirm it fixes things for me too.
Is that the final patch in Comment 36? If so I'll try and get the Gentoo devs
to include it in the GCC ebuilds
Will this be added to GCC 8.1 and 7.4?
Thanks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84051
Bug ID: 84051
Summary: missing -Warray-bounds on an out-of-bounds access via
an array pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
++) with the following results:
Running /ssd/src/gcc/git/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/dg.exp ...
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes465
# of expected failures 18
/ssd/build/hppa-unknown-linux-gnu/gcc-git/gcc/xg++ version 8.0.1 20180125
(experimental) (GCC)
Can you please try
Gerald Pfeifer on 2018/1/23 22:39 wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jan 2018, Chung-Ju Wu wrote:
+New command-line options -mext-perf -mext-perf2 -mext-string
Can you write this as
"...-mext-perf, -mext-perf2, and
-mext-string..."
please?
Approved with that change.
Thank you for the review.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84054
Bug ID: 84054
Summary: seems -fno-bounds-checking no longer supported
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84055
--- Comment #2 from Kip Warner ---
Created attachment 43250
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43250=edit
Assembly listing of minimal.cpp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84055
--- Comment #1 from Kip Warner ---
Created attachment 43249
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43249=edit
Pre-processed intermediate form of minimal.cpp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83982
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Trebbien ---
Created attachment 43247
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43247=edit
Patch for PR 83982 alone
On 1/25/18 3:56 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
> Ok, I'll move the table to driver-rs6000.c and I'll resubmit.
Ok, here is a separate translation table like you wanted. I still use the
RS6000_CPU table to hold entire list of canonical cpu names, the new
translation table in driver-rs6000.c only
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84052
Bug ID: 84052
Summary: Using Randomizing structure layout plugin in linux
kernel compilation doesn't generate proper debuginfo
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.1
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84052
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84052
--- Comment #2 from pino ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Plugins issues like this should reported to the plugin author and not to gcc.
I don't know gcc internals, from my very limited understanding about gcc & that
plugin, the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84056
--- Comment #1 from Alper Ce ---
output:
a => 1
b => 2
Map after if condition(a new pair ['c':0] inserted in map!):
a => 1
b => 2
c => 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84056
Bug ID: 84056
Summary: map insertes a pair when check a value
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83177
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80837
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81889
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #14 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82186
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81997
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78980
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82461
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81373
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81061
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79855
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81013
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82468
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71625
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #14 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78633
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #22 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81456
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81661
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70902
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83830
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82764
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82807
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83317
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83990
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80763
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #15 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84029
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84034
Bug ID: 84034
Summary: incomplete warning message with dos line endings
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46555
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79621
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82722
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32643
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #25 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81004
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #17 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71555
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81961
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80778
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71169
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82804
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70940
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80867
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83945
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82565
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71450
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83860
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82981
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #16 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79929
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #27 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33562
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #34 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70805
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83118
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82331
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.3 |7.4
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener
1 - 100 of 421 matches
Mail list logo