Snapshot gcc-8-20180622 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/8-20180622/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 8 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-8
On 06/18/2018 10:45 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jun 17 2018, Hrishikesh Kulkarni wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am trying to isolate the dump tool into real lto-dump tool. I have
>> started with the copy of lto.c into lto-dump.c and done the
>> changes to Make-lang.in and config-lang.in
On 11/06/18 11:05, Martin Jambor wrote:
The int rate numbers (running 1 copy only) were not too bad, GCC was
only about 2% slower and only 525.x264_r seemed way slower with GCC.
The fp rate numbers (again only 1 copy) showed a larger difference,
around 20%. 521.wrf_r was more than twice as slow
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61247
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
---
On 06/22/2018 02:39 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 9:37 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>>
>> On 06/21/2018 11:04 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>>> When code is compiled at -O0, the RTL middle-end makes sure that location
>>> information is preserved as much as possible by generating NOPs with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86138
--- Comment #21 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jun 22 15:58:38 2018
New Revision: 261907
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261907=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/86138 prevent implicit instantiation of COW empty rep
The explicit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86138
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
On 06/22/2018 09:47 AM, Olivier Hainque wrote:
>
>
>> On 22 Jun 2018, at 17:44, Olivier Hainque wrote:
>
>> Receiving the actual function address would seem more
>> useful for function-instrumentation purposes, and this
>> patch adjusts the compiler to do that instead.
>>
>> 2018-06-22
On 06/13/2018 12:58 PM, Dimitar Dimitrov wrote:
> The PRU load/store instructions can access memory with byte
> granularity for all 30 of its 32-bit GP registers. Examples:
>
># Load 17 bytes from address r0[0] into registers r10.b1-r14.b2
>lbbo r10.b1, r0, 0, 17
>
># Load 100 bytes
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 11:33:06AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 06/13/2018 12:58 PM, Dimitar Dimitrov wrote:
> > The PRU load/store instructions can access memory with byte
> > granularity for all 30 of its 32-bit GP registers. Examples:
> >
> ># Load 17 bytes from address r0[0] into registers
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 08:30:12AM -0500, Kelvin Nilsen wrote:
> This has been committed to trunk.
>
> Is this ok to backport to gcc6, gcc7, and gcc8?
Yes, but wait a few days please. Thanks!
Segher
NightStrike and I were chatting on IRC last week about
issues with trying to vectorize the following code:
#include
std::size_t f(std::vector> const & v) {
std::size_t ret = 0;
for (auto const & w: v)
ret += w.size();
return ret;
}
icc could vectorize it,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84076
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 20:34:33 2018
New Revision: 261917
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261917=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-03-09 Jason Merrill
On 05/16/2018 05:53 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 12/21/2017 10:13 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> On 12/20/2017 06:45 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>> Another thing is that the "/" in there is wrong, so
>>> const char dir_separator_str[] = { DIR_SEPARATOR, '\0' };
>>> char *b = concat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84772
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 20:35:29 2018
New Revision: 261918
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261918=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-03-09 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84841
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 20:46:37 2018
New Revision: 261927
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261927=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-03-16 Jakub Jelinek
PR
All,
The attached patch generates special initializers for derived-type
c_ptr and c_funptr symbols so they are handled correctly by the
translation phase. Previously, an EXPR_STRUCTURE expression was
generated for both types, as c_ptr and c_funptr are structure types
with a c_address field. The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84875
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 20:53:41 2018
New Revision: 261932
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261932=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-03-20 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85140
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 21:03:38 2018
New Revision: 261944
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261944=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-04-03 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84791
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 21:02:52 2018
New Revision: 261943
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261943=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-03-30 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85252
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 21:08:00 2018
New Revision: 261950
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261950=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-04-06 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85659
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 21:20:53 2018
New Revision: 261961
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261961=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-05-06 Jakub Jelinek
PR
That isn't a default any more because the default is 80486 with FPU.
---
gcc/doc/invoke.texi | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
index 9bb1a4910b2..f231da3cde2 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86210
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 21:33:58 2018
New Revision: 261970
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261970=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-06-20 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86231
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 21:33:07 2018
New Revision: 261969
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261969=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-06-20 Jakub Jelinek
PR
Hi!
I've backported following 61 trunk commits to 7.x branch (2 patches contain
more than one commit), bootstrapped/regtested them on x86_64-linux and
i686-linux and committed to 7.x branch.
Jakub
2018-06-22 Jakub Jelinek
Backported from mainline
2018-03-02 Jakub
Hi Segher,
After waiting a few days for this newly committed patch to settle, is it ok to
backport to gcc 6, gcc 7, and gcc 8?
Thanks.
On 6/22/18 5:34 PM, Kelvin Nilsen wrote:
> Thanks for feedback. It turns out that the vmrgew and vmrgow instructions
> require power 8.
>
> After
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86281
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas ---
Hi Rainer and Steve,
I don't know how this got past my regtesting...
The regression on assumed_charlen_function_7.f90 was entirely my fault. I found
the failure, corrected on my tree after saving the diff
Thanks for feedback. It turns out that the vmrgew and vmrgow instructions
require power 8.
After coordinating with Segher on minor refinements to the test cases, I have
committed the patch as quoted below to the trunk.
On 6/19/18 5:37 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, Jun 19,
On 06/22/2018 03:23 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hi.
>
> For correctness of clustering algorithm:
> https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Short-Communication%3A-Correction-to-'Producing-Good-Kannan-Proebsting/311091fb9fb9d38f7b76e768a603c02acc799fe0
>
> one needs to allow single case clusters as
On 06/13/2018 12:57 PM, Dimitar Dimitrov wrote:
> PRU architecture supports maximum 256k program memory (IMEM). Some GCC
> test cases manage to produce executables bigger than that.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> 2018-06-13 Dimitar Dimitrov
>
> * lib/gcc-dg.exp: Bail on region
On 06/13/2018 12:57 PM, Dimitar Dimitrov wrote:
> The floating point support has been borrowed from C6X libgcc port
> to help with TI PRU toolchain ABI compatibility.
>
> libgcc/ChangeLog:
>
> 2018-06-13 Dimitar Dimitrov
>
> * config.host: Add PRU target.
> * config/pru/asri.c:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86285
--- Comment #2 from Peter Bergner ---
When we compile using -mlong-double-64 -mabi=ibmlongdouble, we get what I'd
expect:
(gdb) ptree type
constant 128>
unit-size constant 16>
align:128 warn_if_not_align:0 symtab:0 alias-set -1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86206
--- Comment #3 from Harald Anlauf ---
No ICE if the module is split into two parts:
! No ICE
module zero_mod
implicit none
contains
pure function zero_vec(xx) result(ret)
real, intent(in) :: xx(:)
real :: ret(size(xx))
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86286
Bug ID: 86286
Summary: Could __attribute__ ((nothrow)) on a noexcept function
turn off EH codegen?
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84767
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 20:33:38 2018
New Revision: 261916
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261916=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-03-09 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86287
Bug ID: 86287
Summary: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on bootstrap
with -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84834
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 20:38:25 2018
New Revision: 261921
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261921=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-03-13 Jakub Jelinek
PR
On 06/21/2018 11:06 AM, Olivier Hainque wrote:
> Hello Joseph,
>
> Thanks for getting back to me on this!
>
>> On 19 Jun 2018, at 17:50, Joseph Myers wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 7 Jun 2018, Olivier Hainque wrote:
>>
>>> An updated version of the patch is attached, accounting for
>>> your two comments
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84899
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 20:48:57 2018
New Revision: 261929
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261929=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-03-16 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85994
--- Comment #11 from Daniel Santos ---
Thank you Rainer!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84874
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 20:47:57 2018
New Revision: 261928
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261928=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-03-16 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84961
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 20:54:44 2018
New Revision: 261933
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261933=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-03-21 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84999
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 20:55:40 2018
New Revision: 261934
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261934=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-03-21 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85172
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 21:05:52 2018
New Revision: 261947
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261947=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-04-04 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85167
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 21:05:08 2018
New Revision: 261946
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261946=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-04-03 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86288
Bug ID: 86288
Summary: Recognize __gnu and/or __gnu__ as attribute-namespace
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Hi!
The following testcase got fixed in 8/trunk with r253924 part of
PR82370 enhancements, but that is not IMHO something we should backport.
So instead the following patch adds something simpler, use Yv constraint
for the DImode shift count in instructions that need AVX512VL when EVEX
encoded if
The problem in this testcase was that the initializer looked constant
to is_nondependent_constant_expression, but instantiating it found the
conversion error, but because fold_non_dependent_expr passed tf_none
to the instantiation, we didn't give an error. store_init_value then
happily stuck the
GCC Maintainers:
The following patch addresses test failures on AIX.
The patch has been tested on
powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu (Power 8 LE)
powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu (Power 8 BE)
AIX 7200-00-01-1543 (Power 8 BE)
With no regressions.
Please let me know if the patch looks OK
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 02:08:27PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 06/12/2018 04:46 PM, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > Here's a patch for Bugzilla 80271, to add support for env CLICOLOR_FORCE.
> >
> > Automated build environments -- and even some which you run by hand --
> > redirect the output somewhere
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84662
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 20:28:04 2018
New Revision: 261912
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261912=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-03-02 Jakub Jelinek
PR
On 06/19/2018 09:13 AM, dave.pa...@oracle.com wrote:
> This patch fixes spurious failure for C test added with original patch
> for bug 55976.
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55976
>
> Added dg-prune-output for extraneous message causing unexpected test
> failure for test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84827
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 20:37:40 2018
New Revision: 261920
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261920=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-03-13 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84786
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 20:36:31 2018
New Revision: 261919
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261919=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-03-13 Jakub Jelinek
PR
On 06/20/2018 07:56 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the fix for PR target/81736 unconditionally overrules
> -fno-omit-frame-pointer,
> including at -O0 where it is implicit. That seems brutal and unnecessary so
> the attached patch reverts it at -O0 and thus fixes 135 failures in the GDB
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84860
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 20:41:55 2018
New Revision: 261923
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261923=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-03-15 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84874
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 20:44:39 2018
New Revision: 261926
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261926=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-03-16 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85095
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 21:02:07 2018
New Revision: 261942
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261942=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-03-28 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85068
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 20:59:31 2018
New Revision: 261940
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261940=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-03-27 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85076
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 21:01:00 2018
New Revision: 261941
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261941=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-03-27 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85257
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 21:08:47 2018
New Revision: 261951
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261951=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-04-07 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85313
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 21:09:32 2018
New Revision: 261952
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261952=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-04-10 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85446
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 21:18:32 2018
New Revision: 261958
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261958=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-04-19 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85384
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 21:16:41 2018
New Revision: 261957
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261957=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-06-22 Jakub Jelinek
Backported from mainline
2018-04-18
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85696
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 21:27:25 2018
New Revision: 261964
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261964=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-05-11 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85952
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 21:27:41 2018
New Revision: 261965
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261965=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-05-29 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86025
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 21:28:36 2018
New Revision: 261966
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261966=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-06-04 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85358
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85657
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
On 03/03/2018 05:48 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
> PR demangler/84668 reports this failure of c++filt (found by fuzzing):
>
> $ c++filt '__H5z55_H5z555'
> c++filt: out of memory allocating 18446744071696285694 bytes after a total of
> 135168 bytes
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86219
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jun 22 21:57:07 2018
New Revision: 261972
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261972=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/86219 - ICE with erroneous initializer in template.
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86219
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jun 22 21:57:32 2018
New Revision: 261973
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261973=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/86219 - ICE with erroneous initializer in template.
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86281
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl ---
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 10:36:04PM +, pault at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> I don't know how this got past my regtesting...
>
> The regression on assumed_charlen_function_7.f90 was entirely my
> fault. I
On 06/12/2018 04:46 PM, Adam Borowski wrote:
> Hi!
> Here's a patch for Bugzilla 80271, to add support for env CLICOLOR_FORCE.
>
> Automated build environments -- and even some which you run by hand --
> redirect the output somewhere to save a log, even if they tee it to the
> terminal anyway.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84739
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 20:31:10 2018
New Revision: 261914
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261914=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-03-08 Jakub Jelinek
PR
On 06/12/2018 08:02 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> We didn't split cross-partition ranges in loclists to output a
> whole-function location expression, but with nonzero locviews, we
> force loclists, and then we have to split to avoid cross-partition
> list entries.
>
> From: Alexandre Oliva
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80598
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 20:32:15 2018
New Revision: 261915
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261915=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-03-08 Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84853
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 20:40:45 2018
New Revision: 261922
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261922=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-03-15 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84953
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 20:52:44 2018
New Revision: 261931
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261931=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-03-20 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85018
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 20:51:42 2018
New Revision: 261930
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261930=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-03-22 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78651
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 20:51:42 2018
New Revision: 261930
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261930=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-03-22 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85147
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 21:04:25 2018
New Revision: 261945
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261945=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-04-03 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85022
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 20:57:15 2018
New Revision: 261937
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261937=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-03-23 Jakub Jelinek
PR
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 02:22:50PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 01:26:19PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 12:09:12PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > > > * config.gcc (powerpc64le*): Remove multilib support for IEEE
> > > > and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84463
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 21:12:32 2018
New Revision: 261956
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261956=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-04-18 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85696
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 21:25:04 2018
New Revision: 261963
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261963=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-05-11 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85878
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 21:30:06 2018
New Revision: 261968
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261968=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-06-15 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86219
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
On 06/18/2018 01:15 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> While looking into opportunities to detect strnlen/strlen coding
> mistakes (pr86199) I noticed a bug in the strnlen implementation
> I committed earlier today that lets a strnlen() result be saved
> and used in subsequent calls to strlen() with the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86281
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Jun 22 22:31:17 2018
New Revision: 261975
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261975=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-06-22 Paul Thomas
Rainer Orth
PR fortran/86281
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 04:46:19PM -0400, Fritz Reese wrote:
>
> With the patch, the trunk compiler does not exhibit the bugs in the
> mentioned PRs (82972, 83088, 85851). I did encounter some issues
> building and regression testing the trunk compiler which I am certain
> are unrelated. The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84700
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 20:29:34 2018
New Revision: 261913
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261913=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-03-05 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79085
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 20:43:53 2018
New Revision: 261925
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261925=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-03-15 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84222
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 20:43:09 2018
New Revision: 261924
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261924=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-03-15 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84990
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 20:51:42 2018
New Revision: 261930
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261930=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-03-22 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84941
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 20:56:25 2018
New Revision: 261936
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261936=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-03-22 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85034
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 20:58:02 2018
New Revision: 261938
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261938=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-03-23 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85210
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 21:07:16 2018
New Revision: 261949
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261949=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-04-06 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85022
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 20:58:44 2018
New Revision: 261939
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261939=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-03-23 Jakub Jelinek
PR
1 - 100 of 317 matches
Mail list logo
