Segher and I are planning to remove the machinery supporting
RS6000_CALL_GLUE. In the AIX ABI, used by AIX, PowerOpen, PPC64 Linux
and mcall-aixdesc, direct calls to named functions that may be
external are followed by a special no-op instruction that the linker
can replace with an instruction to
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com wrote:
Any suggestion about how I could avoid generating this zero_extension?
Redundant extensions have been a hot topic for some time. The combiner should
catch the local easy cases, we have ree.c for the nonlocal easy cases
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Uday P. Khedker u...@cse.iitb.ac.in wrote:
We have designed and implemented a fully flow and context sensitive
points-to analysis in gcc-4.6.0. For simplicity, we have made a dynamic
plugin available at http://www.cse.iitb.ac.in/grc/index.php?page=l-fcpa.
This
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
accepted the AArch64 port for inclusion in GCC and appointed
Richard Earnshaw and Marcus Shawcroft as co-maintainers.
Happy hacking!
David
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Perry Smith pedz...@gmail.com wrote:
In stage 3, libatomic's configure fails. The config.log file is here:
https://gist.github.com/3931504
I've recreated the conftest.c and ran the same command. The output is fine
and executes with a 0 status.
The clue
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Perry Smith pedz...@gmail.com wrote:
This is on my quest to add __cxa_atexit to AIX's GCC. I'm trying to port my
patches to trunk.
David said I should move my two files to libgcc.a instead of libstdc++.a
which is where I put them before.
These files
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
accepted the Address Sanitizer (ASAN) feature and its associated runtime
support library imported from an external repository. Jakub Jelinek,
Dodji Seketeli, Kostya Serebryany, and Dmitry Vyukov have been appointed
co-reviewers.
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 3:30 AM, Sebastian Huber
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de wrote:
what is the reference test platform for the 32-bit PowerPC target? We have
the primary target powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu and the secondary target
powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0. On the GCC compile farm there
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Sebastian Huber
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de wrote:
Ok, does this mean that there is no primary and secondary target in GCC that
covers PowerPC Book E with ELF and EABI?
If I change something in this area is there at least a well known tertiary
target?
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Nolen, Steven D drn...@lanl.gov wrote:
In the c++11 headers for the random number generation (random.h), the
function discard for the linear_congruential has been implemented in a very
inefficient manner. Many modern Monte Carlo codes require this function to
Future implementations of the IBM POWER architecture will include
hardware support for transaction memory. IBM is beginning to release
more information about the design and implementation. The
documentation of the POWER architecture transaction memory ISA has
been placed on the power.org website.
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Tom Tromey tro...@redhat.com wrote:
David == David Taylor dtay...@emc.com writes:
David It appears that STABS is largely in maintenance mode. Are there any
David plans to deprecate STABS support? If STABS enhancements were made and
David posted would they be
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Jonas Maebe jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be wrote:
On 03 Jan 2013, at 21:53, David Edelsohn wrote:
AIX still uses STABS. GCC produces it and GDB consumes it.
More precisely, AIX uses Stabx. It's similar to Stabs, but different in quite
a few ways. To add
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 3:20 PM, David Edelsohn dje@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Joel Brobecker brobec...@adacore.com wrote:
AIX still uses STABS. GCC produces it and GDB consumes it.
Recent releases of AIX now support DWARF as well, but GCC and GDB have
not been
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 2:53 AM, Joel Brobecker brobec...@adacore.com wrote:
Can you please clarify what GNU ld is not completely usable means?
Is that referring to DWARF support? to compatibility with specific AIX
releases? to compatibility with AIX DWARF feature?
Sorry, I meant what GNU
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Joel Brobecker brobec...@adacore.com wrote:
It does not look like the changes were merged into the FSF tree. This
also does not support some of the more recent AIX features added to
GCC.
Tristan is usually pretty good at sending these sorts of patches.
I will
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 3:10 AM, Joel Brobecker brobec...@adacore.com wrote:
I was able to speak to Tristan, yesterday, and he confirmed that
we haven't been able to contribute a few of the patches he wrote.
Unfortunately, his TODO list is more than full, at the moment, and
we don't think he'll
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Arnaud Charlet char...@adacore.com wrote:
We haven't done any work to support TLS in gnu as/ld on AIX (other
than ignore these sections for now to avoid generating hard errors), so
enabling TLS in GCC would indeed cause some troubles, although we don't
use TLS
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
accepted the Synopsys DesignWare ARC port for inclusion in GCC and appointed
Joern Rennecke as maintainer.
Please join me in congratulating Joern on his new role.
Joern, please update your listing in the MAINTAINERS
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Thomas Baier ba...@microsys.de wrote:
Dear list,
I've just subscribed to the list and I hope this is the right place for
the following question.
The operating system I'd like to use gcc for (OS-9, for the curious)
requires an ABI, where global variables are
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Uday Khedker u...@cse.iitb.ac.in wrote:
I would like to take this training program to the next level but so long
it remains my personal baby, my funding agency does not feel that I have
accomplished much because they feel that if my program has any merit,
the
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Uday Khedker u...@cse.iitb.ac.in wrote:
I would like to take this training program to the next level but so long
it remains my personal baby, my funding agency does not feel that I have
accomplished much because they feel that if my program has any merit,
the
I will inquire with the FSF Copyright Clerk.
- David
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Rainer Emrich
rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Maxim,
Am 07.01.2013 08:44, schrieb Maxim Kuvyrkov:
On 4/01/2013, at 12:54 AM, Rainer Emrich wrote:
I
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
Also note that for SPEC -funroll-loops helps GCC (yes ... we don't
enable that by default at -O3, we probably should).
Richi,
Are you suggesting enabling -funroll-loops by default at -O3? When I
checked earlier
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Damian Rouson sourc...@rouson.net wrote:
I'm interested in contributing to the gfortran compiler. Please send
me any forms or instructions I need to follow regarding copyright
assignment.
I sent the forms directly.
- David
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013, Sebastian Huber wrote:
GCC trunk remains in release branch mode, with only regression fixes
and documentation changes allowed.
is there a chance to get this committed to GCC 4.8 even if
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Dave Korn dave.korn.cyg...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/03/2013 16:05, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
If no new P1 appears within a week,
I may be about to file one. What priority would Java doesn't compile on a
secondary platform count as? There's a trivial bug in libffi
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Jason Vas Dias
jason.vas.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi - I wonder if anyone could please tell me if gcc's thread local
storage support is meant to be enabled on AIX or not -
I've built gcc-4.7.2 on AIX 6.1 OK, with ---enable-threads ,
using the AIX system
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Jason Vas Dias
jason.vas.d...@gmail.com wrote:
But why didn't the compiler complain that TLS was not supported ?
Shouldn't it be doing so ? It is definitely not OK in my book for gcc
to finish compilation and linkage with no errors or warnings, when
it has
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:58 AM, Will william.swashbuck...@gmail.com wrote:
James Lemke jwlemke at codesourcery.com writes:
I have completed the binutils submission for VLE.
I am working on the gcc submission. The test results are looking good
now. Patches will be posted very soon.
Do you
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 6:28 AM, David Brown da...@westcontrol.com wrote:
I use Freescale PPC devices with VLE, and I use Freescale's CodeWarrior
to do so. At the start of the project, I looked at CodeSourcery's
PPC-EABI tools (I have used CodeSourcery's gcc tools for other targets)
- but
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:29 AM, Andris Pavenis andris.pave...@iki.fi wrote:
Forgot to say that I also had to apply this patch
--- ../gcc-4.8.0/libbacktrace/alloc.c2013-01-14 19:17:30.0
+0100
+++ ../gcc-4.80/libbacktrace/alloc.c2013-03-24 18:07:11.995891959
+0100
@@ -34,6
Richi,
The GCC documentation for fp-contract is a little confusing and I'm
not sure what was intended. The last sentences says:
-ffp-contract=on enables floating-point expression contraction if
allowed by the language standard. This is currently not implemented
and treated equal to
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 10:38 AM, David Taylor dtay...@emc.com wrote:
Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:45:46AM -0400, David Taylor wrote:
There are problems when using current STABS debug format for 64 bit
targets.
Why are you considering extending STABS at
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Michael Witten mfwit...@gmail.com wrote:
That wiki information should be incorporated into what that wiki page
calls `the official installation docs', and the rest of it should
probably be thrown out as superfluous.
I agree that information about GCC is
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Alan Modra amo...@gmail.com wrote:
The following patch disables lower-subreg for double double TFmode,
bootstrap and regression tests are OK, but I'm a little unsure whether
this is the right thing to do.
* rs6000.c (TARGET_INIT_LOWER_SUBREG): Define.
GCC is hosted on platforms other than SVR4 ABI and ELF file format.
- David
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Dmitry Mikushin dmi...@kernelgen.org wrote:
FWIW, we also needed to perform multiple invocations of toplev_main from
a single execution of GCC frontend, which seems to be quite similar.
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Carrot Wei car...@google.com wrote:
Hi
When I tried to build 444.namd with options -O2 -m64 -mvsx
-mcpu=power7, I can see vsx instructions are actually used, there are
many xs- started instructions, but none of them use high registers
[vsr32 -vsr63], does
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
accepted the Andes nds32 port for inclusion in GCC and appointed
Chung-Ju Wu and Shiva Chen as port maintainers. The initial patch
needs approval from a GCC GWP maintainer before it may be committed.
Please join me in
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Carrot Wei car...@google.com wrote:
In insn patterns the register class is usually not directly used, instead
different predicates and constraints are used. So can we use different
predicates and constraints in memory access instructions and floating
point
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
accepted the Altera Nios II port for inclusion in GCC and appointed
Chung-Lin Tang and Sandra Loosemore as port maintainers. The initial patch
needs approval from a GCC GWP maintainer before it may be committed.
Please
The same error occurs on AIX because the tests are run without pthreads.
- David
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:22 AM, Bin.Cheng amker.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I spotted case ext/headers.cc failed on arm-none-eabi with below information:
In file included from
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 11:57 PM, Rodolfo Guilherme Wottrich
rgw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
I would like to be able to generate multiple binaries from a single
source file, each of which being slightly different from the other(s).
For example, in case there's an OpenMP parallel
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw jbg...@lug-owl.de wrote:
Hi!
On Mon, 2013-08-26 12:51:53 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw jbg...@lug-owl.de
wrote:
On Tue, 2013-08-20 11:24:31 +0400, Alexander Ivchenko aivch...@gmail.com
wrote:
I certainly missed that OPTION_BIONIC is not
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
appointed Caroline Tice as VTV (libvtv) maintainer.
Please join me in congratulating Caroline on her new role.
Please update your listing in the MAINTAINERS file.
Happy hacking!
David
I have established Google+ and Twitter pages for the GNU Toolchain
(GCC, Binutils, GDB) as additional, un-official communication channels
for announcements and highlights of interesting mailing list
discussions.
https://plus.google.com/108467477471815191158
https://twitter.com/gnutools
Anyone
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013, David Edelsohn wrote:
I have established Google+ and Twitter pages for the GNU Toolchain
(GCC, Binutils, GDB) as additional, un-official communication channels
What about covering glibc
, but David
Edelsohn
said at my appointment as maintainer:
: The GCC SC has approved acceptance of the port and you as maintainer.
: I will announce that shortly. Because the patches that you want to
: include in GCC 4.8 are localized to the port, I think that it still
: should be possible to merge
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/02/2013 12:47 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
It is unfortunate that global reviewers are so busy that they cannot
review the few, infrequent new port submissions. But I find it very
distasteful for someone to hyperventilate
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 5:31 PM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote:
Some questions for the GCC steering committee:
* is this JIT work a good thing? (I think so, obviously, but can I go
ahead and e.g. add it to the wiki under Current Projects?)
* do you like the general approach?
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Matthias Klose d...@ubuntu.com wrote:
A make install from trunk 20131020 seems to be broken, at least when building
with Go (last time I successfully installed was 20130917). However, even
without Go enabled, dfa.c is rebuilt and and then the depending binaries
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com wrote:
I suppose targets without .bss section support should not switch
(that is, targets not defining BSS_SECTION_ASM_OP or
ASM_OUTPUT_ALIGNED_BSS).
Good point. I don't expect that we have many of those left, but
if any do
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
appointed Oleg Endo as co-maintainer of the SH port.
Please join me in congratulating Oleg on his new role.
Oleg, please update your listing in the MAINTAINERS file.
Happy hacking!
David
new year!
The GCC Steering Commitee
David Edelsohn
Kaveh Ghazi
Jeffrey Law
Marc Lehmann
Jason Merrill
David Miller
Toon Moene
Joseph Myers
Gerald Pfeifer
Joel Sherrill
Jim Wilson
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Eric S. Raymond e...@thyrsus.com wrote:
Maybe nobody bothers because using clang is easier than to fight with
FSF policies.
Which is pretty close if not identical to my original point.
Your original point came across as a complaint that GCC does not
support
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
[adding libstdc++@]
Bill Schmidt wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com writes:
It was recently pointed out to me that our new powerpc64le-linux-gnu
target does not yet have a corresponding directory in libstdc
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Denis Chertykov cherty...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-03-03 15:35 GMT+04:00 David Brown da...@westcontrol.com:
On 02/03/14 19:24, Denis Chertykov wrote:
I would remove two maintainers for AVR port:
1. Anatoly Sokolov ae...@post.ru
2. Eric Weddington
are happy to gain their experience and
knowledge.
The GCC Steering Commitee
David Edelsohn
Kaveh Ghazi
Jeffrey Law
Marc Lehmann
Jason Merrill
David Miller
Toon Moene
Joseph Myers
Gerald Pfeifer
Ramana Radhakrishnan
Joel Sherrill
Ian Lance Taylor
Jim Wilson
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
appointed Richard Sandiford, Mike Stump and Ken Zadeck as Wide-Int Reviewers.
Please join me in congratulating Richard, Mike and Ken
on their new role. Please update your listings in the MAINTAINERS file.
Happy
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 5:27 AM, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
Status
==
The 4.8 branch is now frozen as I am preparing a first release
candidate for 4.8.3. All patches to the branch now require
explicit approval from release managers.
Please hold off on GCC 4.8.3.
It gives me great pleasure to announce that GCC has won the
ACM SIGPLAN Programming Languages Software Award
Congratulations to the entire GCC Community!
- David
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 5:01 AM, Bingfeng Mei b...@broadcom.com wrote:
As a short term solution, I tried some simple non-linear functions as Richard
suggested
to penalize using too many IVs. For example, the following cost in
ivopts_global_cost_for_size fixed my regression and actually
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear steering committee,
To support the offloading features for Intel's Xeon Phi cards
we need to add a foreign library (liboffload) into the gcc repository.
README with build instructions is attached.
I
This failure now appears for powerpc-aix. I do not know if it happens
for ppc64-linux also.
Bootstrap currently is broken on AIX.
build/genmodes -h tmp-modes.h
build/genmodes: config/rs6000/rs6000-modes.def:23: (TF) field format
must not be set
build/genmodes: machmode.def:203: (DF) field
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:19 AM, Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de wrote:
David Malcolm wrote:
I didn't see a place to post slides for Cauldron talks, so am posting
links to them here.
I have added the links to
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/cauldron2014#Slides_and_Notes
Does anyone know if any
Hi, Jan
This probably is expected for AIX 4.3. I am surprised that this
occurs for AIX 5.3 because I thought that weak support was available
after AIX 5.1 or AIX 5.2.
I think that the weak support and MAKE_DECL_ONE_ONLY are required for
proper operation now.
Maybe I should formally deprecate
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 4:18 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Status
==
The trunk is scheduled to transition from Stage 1 to Stage 3 at the end
of Saturday, November 15th (use your timezone to your advantage).
We have been in Stage 1 for almost 7 months now with a fortnight
Kirill,
The patches have broken bootstrap on AIX and probably on other non-GNU
platforms. strchrnul() is a GNU extension.
/nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/gcc/lto-wrapper.c: In function 'unsigned int
parse_env_var(const char*, char***, const char*)':
/nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/gcc/lto-wrapper.c:427:35:
Because they have not shown general performance benefit.
I hope that the renewed attention and development effort will allow
them to be enabled by default eventually.
Thanks, David
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
Is there any specific reason why none of
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 4:18 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Status
==
It is time for another 4.8 release, I'd like to create 4.8.4 release
candidate at the end of the next week and if all goes well, 4.8.4 release
a week after that. If you have any safe fixes you'd like to be
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 7:35 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Status
==
The GCC 4.8.4-rc1 release candidate has been released.
The branch is frozen now, all changes require release manager approval
until the final release of GCC 4.8.4 which should happen roughly
one week after
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 7:17 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 04:51:21PM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
GCC 4.8 branch has degraded from 14 libstdc++ failures to 153. This
On which target, when it has been reported, are the libstdc++ folks aware of
that?
I see
Jakub,
I would like to backport this fixincludes patch to the GCC 4.8 branch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-08/msg01975.html
Thanks, David
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 7:17 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 04:51:21PM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
GCC 4.8
Jakub Jelinek writes:
Jakub compiled on ppc64-linux with -O2 -m64 -mminimal-toc
Jakub leads to bl bar without nop in the following instruction
Jakub and to sibling call.
Jakub Now, when this together with bar's definition is linked
Jakub into a big binary and foo and bar need to have different
Mark Mitchell writes:
Mark I think the DECL_EXTERNAL case should go before the visibility checks in
Mark default_binds_local_p_1. A DECL_EXTERNAL entity never binds locally.
Jakub,
Do you want to follow up with a patch to change the ordering of
tests in default_binds_local_p_1()?
Mark Mitchell writes:
Mark That would be my recommendation: limit optimizations that require a
Mark short branch to calls to functions in the same translation unit, not
Mark just in the same shared object. But, that's just my two cents; the
Mark Power maintainers might have a different take.
Emitting a NOP depends on SYMBOL_FLAG_LOCAL.
if (targetm.binds_local_p (decl))
flags |= SYMBOL_FLAG_LOCAL;
PPC64 uses the default binds_local_p() hook, default_binds_local_p_1():
/* If defined in this object and visibility is not default, must be
local. */
else if
Mark Mitchell writes:
Mark Good point -- if there's no definition in the current translation unit,
Mark then I guess we aren't going to make any bad assumptions about the
Mark contents of the function. So, I guess that just means that the Power
Mark back end needs to check for !DECL_EXTERNAL in
Jakub Jelinek writes:
Jakub I guess the right thing to do would be to replace the current
Jakub 3 uses of SYMBOL_REF_LOCAL_P (x) macro in config/rs6000/*.md
Jakub with
Jakub SYMBOL_REF_LOCAL_P (x) (!TARGET_ARCH64 || !SYMBOL_REF_EXTERNAL_P (x))
Jakub where TARGET_ARCH64 is replaced by whatever
Richard Sandiford writes:
Richard So which of (1) and (2) from my message do think is best? Replace
backend
Richard uses with reload_completed when doing so is safe, or consistently
replace
Richard it with reload_in_progress || reload_completed throughout the
backends?
Richard,
I
Alexandre Oliva writes:
Alexandre It's as mechanical as the change you proposed, except that yours
Alexandre potentially loses information that would enable someone to recover
Alexandre !BEFORE_RELOAD_P() out of the expanded version of no_new_pseudos.
Except that no_new_pseudos was not
Alexandre Oliva writes:
Except that no_new_pseudos was not used consistently.
Alex I'm not sure what you mean by consistently, but regardless, how
Alex could any argument possibly make it better to replace it with
Alex (reload_in_progress || reload_completed)
Alex rather than
Alex
Alexandre Oliva writes:
Alexandre Collapsing no_new_pseudos with anything else that doesn't carry the
Alexandre semantics it currently expresses is a transformation that loses
Alexandre information. Pretty please don't do this just because the current
Alexandre code doesn't care about this
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
appointed Andreas Krebbel as s390 port co-maintainer.
Please join me in congratulating Andreas on his new role.
Andreas, please update your listing in the MAINTAINERS file.
Happy hacking!
David
Doug Gregor writes:
Doug Could we ask the SC to reconsider the change in the GCC major version
Doug numbering for GPLv3? Or, at the very least, explain why it is
Doug important to change the major version number for a mere license
Doug change?
To avoid confusion among GCC users who do
Ian Lance Taylor writes:
Ian To pile on after my earlier message, I would say that the change in
Ian license does not matter at all, not even a tiny bit, for gcc *users*.
Ian It only matters for gcc *distributors*. And I think the vastly
Ian smaller population of gcc distributors can be reached
Doug Gregor writes:
Doug It seems obvious to me that it would be easiest to just move today's
Doug mainline over to GPLv3, and have every GCC release = 4.3 be GPLv3. We
Doug could then either cut off the GCC 4.2 branch entirely or leave it
Doug GPLv2. Then there are no surprises for anyone.
Dave Korn writes:
Doug could then either cut off the GCC 4.2 branch entirely or leave it
Doug GPLv2. Then there are no surprises for anyone.
Leaving released branches as GPLv2 is not an option.
Dave What, even *closed* release branches?
The comment referred to GCC 4.2. GCC 4.2
Benjamin Smedberg writes:
Doug It seems obvious to me that it would be easiest to just move today's
Doug mainline over to GPLv3, and have every GCC release = 4.3 be GPLv3. We
Doug could then either cut off the GCC 4.2 branch entirely or leave it
Doug GPLv2. Then there are no surprises for
Richard Kenner writes:
Because the FSF says it is not an option. The FSF holds the
copyright and decides on the licensing.
Richard True, but RMS has been known to change his mind when people point out
to him
Richard the consequences of a decision.
The GCC SC has not been able to
Bernd Schmidt writes:
Bernd I don't think that's true. Given that all copyrights are assigned to
Bernd the FSF, the FSF could license these changes as GPLv2+ (in 4.2) and
Bernd GPLv3+ (in 4.3 and up) without a problem. The original author's wishes
Bernd do not come into play.
Richard Kenner writes:
Richard Now, suppose I apply it to the GPLv2 version of the file. One could
argue
Richard that such file is now GPLv3 and I think that'd be correct. But since
the
Richard parts of the file being patched are identical, the patch is
indistinguishable
Richard from one
Razya,
Many of the tests fail on AIX as well.
David
FAIL: gcc.dg/matrix/matrix-1.c scan-ipa-dump-times Flattened 3 dimensions
1
FAIL: gcc.dg/matrix/matrix-2.c scan-ipa-dump-times Flattened 2 dimensions
1
FAIL: gcc.dg/matrix/matrix-3.c scan-ipa-dump-times Flattened 2 dimensions
1
FAIL:
Diego Novillo writes:
Diego I've always found the term Non-Autopoiesis too pretentious and
Diego unnecessarily complex. In a recent thread, Tobias Schluter proposed
Diego Non-autonomous, which is at least more readily understandable.
Diego Would this patch be OK? Any other suggestions for a
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
promoted Zdenek Dvorak to full maintainership of all of the GCC
loop infrastructure.
Please join me in congratulating Zdenek on his new role.
Zdenek, please update your listing in the MAINTAINERS file.
Happy hacking!
I think the cost would be something like:
Index: rs6000.c
===
--- rs6000.c(revision 127484)
+++ rs6000.c(working copy)
@@ -20292,10 +20292,15 @@
*total += COSTS_N_INSNS (2);
return false;
+case
Zack Weinberg writes:
Zack Makes sense. I don't suppose I could persuade you to teach rs6000
Zack RTX_COSTS about clz and popcount...?
Sure. It's not that difficult to add to the table.
David
Segher Boessenkool writes:
I think the cost would be something like:
+case POPCOUNT:
+ *total = COSTS_N_INSNS (3);
+ return false;
Segher Is that the cost when using popcountb? It is a lot more
Segher expensive when that instruction isn't available (like on
Segher most
Segher Boessenkool writes:
Yes, but do we even create POPCOUNT rtx if the insn isn't
supported? Wouldn't we expand or create libcall early?
Segher I don't know, there's only one way to find out... :-)
I did check. Didn't you?
David
Ed S Peschko writes:
Ed which would be fine if the AIX linker works, but I'm getting segmentation
Ed faults when compiling perl out of the box, using the gcc-4.1.0 compiler
Ed provided.. I'm wondering if its the compiler, the linker, or both...
You have not provided information for
1 - 100 of 2801 matches
Mail list logo
