Re: [Gcl-devel] Troubles bulding gcl 2.7.0t3

2005-08-10 Thread Vadim V. Zhytnikov
Camm Maguire writes: Greetings! "Vadim V. Zhytnikov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Since I already spent some time meditating on GCL's makefile and things it is supposed to do I'll try do some cosmetic patch for t4. Thanks! Also, if you have the time for some of the ansi print/format funct

RE: [Gcl-devel] Version_2_7_0t5

2005-08-10 Thread Page, Bill
Camm, On Wednesday, August 10, 2005 2:14 PM you wrote: > ... > Re: [Gcl-devel] Version_2_7_0t5 > > Greetings! Small correction -- there is a minor issue remaining > in t5 for axiom. > I am glad to hear that building Axiom (on Linux at least) with gcl 2.7.0 is so close! :) Tim has recently mov

[Gcl-devel] Re: compile-file bug?

2005-08-10 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! OK, that's in cvs head now -- wonder how that got broken. Take care, Robert Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > For t5, in the most recent fix to *split-files* stuff, in the function > compile-file, in cmpnew/cmpmain.lisp, the first print statement should read > > (pri

Re: [Gcl-devel] Version_2_7_0t5

2005-08-10 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! Small correction -- there is a minor issue remaining in t5 for axiom. Take care, Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Greetings! Happy to announce > > Stable version: 2.6.6 > Testing version: (cvs tag) Version_2_7_0t5 > > This is just a cleanup tag for the very helpful flurr

[Gcl-devel] Small bug

2005-08-10 Thread Robert Thorpe
I recently installed GCL from source. To do this I followed the instructions in the README file. It worked, but I noticed the readme file was very old. The latest dates it mentions are in the mid 90s (it talks about "the forthcoming ANSI spec" for Common Lisp. Some of the internet URLs it gives

[Gcl-devel] Version_2_7_0t5

2005-08-10 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! Happy to announce Stable version: 2.6.6 Testing version: (cvs tag) Version_2_7_0t5 This is just a cleanup tag for the very helpful flurry of error reports submitted against t4. This builds axiom, acl2, and maxima, at least for me. Take care, -- Camm Maguire

Re: [Gcl-devel] Version_2_7_0t4

2005-08-10 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! Thanks as always Mike for your incredible efforts here. I really apologize if recent developments have made your life more difficult. I think the immediate fixnum and two word cons which they support ar eworth the effort on mingw -- certainly (hopefully) Jared at the University of Tex

[Gcl-devel] Re: tub

2005-08-10 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! Robert Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You might want to look at > >http://www.BitWagon.com/tub/tub.html > > for documentation of tub (evade task_unapped_base) for a hack that supposedly > lets one get up 2.8GB. Fairly recent. And it is a user-mode hack, i.e., one > does no

Re: [Gcl-devel] Troubles bulding gcl 2.7.0t3

2005-08-10 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! "Vadim V. Zhytnikov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Since I already spent some time meditating on GCL's makefile and > things it is supposed to do I'll try do some cosmetic patch for t4. > Thanks! Also, if you have the time for some of the ansi print/format function compliance, that

[Gcl-devel] Re: big in *split-files*

2005-08-10 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! I believe this is fixed now in cvs head. Working on a t5 cleanup tag. Take care, Robert Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > t4 still has the bug about *split-files* (the overwriting of a file being > compiled)!! This comes up trying to run the nqthm-1992 tests. I'll > just rep

Re: [Gcl-devel] Compiler bug from random type prop tester: keywords in member types?

2005-08-10 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! I believe this is fixed now in cvs head. Working on a t5 cleanup tag. Take care, "Paul F. Dietz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The following rather odd bug has showed up (from running > random-type-prop.typep.1): > > (deftest misc.612 >(funcall > (compile nil '(lambda (p1

[Gcl-devel] Re: compiler bug in t4

2005-08-10 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! I believe this is fixed now in cvs head. Working on a t5 cleanup tag. Take care, Robert Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Just got t4 and tried to compile ACL2 but it quickly broke in the earliest > part of compilation. Here is any easy demo of the problem. > > 1. Be connected t

Re: [Gcl-devel] Two more random tester failures in cvs head

2005-08-10 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! I believe this is fixed now in cvs head. Working on a t5 cleanup tag. Take care, "Paul F. Dietz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've added two more random tester-found bugs to misc.lsp. > > misc.613 is a failure involving throws in lambda forms > in REDUCE. The enclosing catch form