[Gcl-devel] Re: [dk...@cs.utexas.edu: Re: interrupts in 64-bit GCL]

2009-02-25 Thread Matt Kaufmann
Hi -- You can just make your own directory, grab ACL2 from the web as follows wget http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/moore/acl2/v3-4/distrib/acl2.tar.gz and then, after extracting with "tar xfz acl2.tar.gz", type make LISP= in your source directory. Actually, if you want to build ACL2 *exactly*

[Gcl-devel] Re: [dk...@cs.utexas.edu: Re: interrupts in 64-bit GCL]

2009-02-25 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings, and thanks! And the acl2 source location, and any special build instructions? Take care, Matt Kaufmann writes: > Forwarding to gcl-devel: > > From: "David A. Kotz" > Subject: Re: interrupts in 64-bit GCL > To: Matt Kaufmann > CC: c...@maguirefamily.org, gr...@cs.utexas.edu, gcl-de

Re: [Gcl-devel] GCC 4.4 and strict aliasing

2009-02-25 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Camm Maguire wrote: >> Greetings, and my apologies!  Forgot to commit the configure script, >> as opposed to configure.in.  Please try again and let me know if you >> have problems. > > I updated and it b

[Gcl-devel] [dk...@cs.utexas.edu: Re: interrupts in 64-bit GCL]

2009-02-25 Thread Matt Kaufmann
Forwarding to gcl-devel: --- Start of forwarded message --- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:10:58 -0600 From: "David A. Kotz" To: Matt Kaufmann CC: c...@maguirefamily.org, gr...@cs.utexas.edu, gcl-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: interrupts in 64-bit GCL In-Reply-To: <200902252007.n1pk7mv5025...@lhu

[Gcl-devel] Re: interrupts in 64-bit GCL

2009-02-25 Thread Matt Kaufmann
Great! Thank you. Dave, if you send me your build instructions, I'll forward them along since you're (I'm guessing) not on the gcl-devel list, which only allows posts from members. Thanks -- -- Matt Cc: dk...@cs.utexas.edu, gr...@cs.utexas.edu, gcl-devel@gnu.org From: Camm Maguire Date

[Gcl-devel] Re: interrupts in 64-bit GCL

2009-02-25 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! OK, suprisingly enough I think I might have indirectly deduced what is going on. It is verifiably independent of SGC, but appears related to 64bit only by the enhanced time window possible in which to receive SIGINT. In short, could you please send me (and post to gcl-devel) the instr