On Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 12:41 PM Camm Maguire wrote:
> Greetings! Just a heads up that I've released a fix for this and am
> running it through its paces now.
That's great! Thank you.
> Similar reloc support is needed for the big-endian ppc64, but I no
> longer have access to any such machine f
Greetings! Just a heads up that I've released a fix for this and am
running it through its paces now.
Similar reloc support is needed for the big-endian ppc64, but I no
longer have access to any such machine for debugging, so have added
-mno-pltseq to the flags there. If anyone wants to help wit
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 8:53 AM Camm Maguire wrote:
> Greetings! Might you please post objdump -h, -t, -r, and -d on
> gcl_pcl_pkg.o when you get a chance?
Sure, it is attached.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
$ objdump -h gcl_pcl_pkg.o
gcl_pcl_pkg.o: file format elf64-powerpcle
S
Greetings! Might you please post objdump -h, -t, -r, and -d on
gcl_pcl_pkg.o when you get a chance?
Take care,
Jerry James writes:
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 1:23 PM Camm Maguire wrote:
>> Greetings, and thanks for the heads up! I did try reproducing but the
>> Debian porterboxes did not seem
On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 1:23 PM Camm Maguire wrote:
> Greetings, and thanks for the heads up! I did try reproducing but the
> Debian porterboxes did not seem to have this gcc version yet. I will
> get to it.
No rush. I have an acceptable workaround for now. Regards,
--
Jerry James
http:/
Greetings, and thanks for the heads up! I did try reproducing but the
Debian porterboxes did not seem to have this gcc version yet. I will
get to it.
Take care,
Jerry James writes:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 8:43 PM Jerry James wrote:
>> We see the following unhandled relocation types:
>>
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 8:43 PM Jerry James wrote:
> We see the following unhandled relocation types:
> - 31 == R_PPC64_PLT16_HA
> - 60 == R_PPC64_PLT16_LO_DS
> - 119 == R_PPC64_PLTSEQ
> - 120 == R_PPC64_PLTCALL
I have discovered that passing -mno-pltseq to gcc prevents these
relocation types fro
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 8:08 PM Jerry James wrote:
> I don't have administrative access to any ppc64le hardware. Is there
> some other way I can be of help?
I poked a little at this tonight. The unknown relocation type, plus 3
more which I will describe below, shows up while processing
pcl/gcl_p
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 9:16 AM Camm Maguire wrote:
> Greetings! I only have access to a ppc64le machine (i.e. no function
> descriptors) at gcc 8.3, with no gcc-9 packages yet in sid. Might you
> provide access to the setup?
I'm afraid that the only ppc64le machines I have access to are
Fedora'
Greetings! I only have access to a ppc64le machine (i.e. no function
descriptors) at gcc 8.3, with no gcc-9 packages yet in sid. Might you
provide access to the setup?
Take care,
Camm Maguire writes:
> Greetings, and thanks so much! I'll look into it and get back to you.
>
> Take care,
>
> J
Greetings, and thanks so much! I'll look into it and get back to you.
Take care,
Jerry James writes:
> Hi Camm,
>
> My latest attempt to build gcl for Fedora, with the upcoming gcc 9,
> failed on ppc64 due to unknown reloc type 31, which appears to be
> R_PPC64_PLT16_HA. Regards,
--
Camm Ma
Hi Camm,
My latest attempt to build gcl for Fedora, with the upcoming gcc 9,
failed on ppc64 due to unknown reloc type 31, which appears to be
R_PPC64_PLT16_HA. Regards,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
Gcl-devel mailing list
Gcl-devel@gnu.
12 matches
Mail list logo
