Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt RFC 41 : Support for multiple geometry fields in OGR

2013-08-01 Thread Even Rouault
Hi, Motion: I move to adopt RFC 41 : Support for multiple geometry fields in OGR http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc41_multiple_geometry_fields I've made a few changes in the last few days. See the history :

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt RFC 41 : Support for multiple geometry fields in OGR

2013-08-01 Thread Daniel Morissette
+1 Very nice addition! Daniel On 13-08-01 10:16 AM, Even Rouault wrote: Hi, Motion: I move to adopt RFC 41 : Support for multiple geometry fields in OGR http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc41_multiple_geometry_fields I've made a few changes in the last few days. See the history :

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt RFC 41 : Support for multiple geometry fields in OGR

2013-08-01 Thread Andre Joost
Am 01.08.2013 16:16, schrieb Even Rouault: Hi, Motion: I move to adopt RFC 41 : Support for multiple geometry fields in OGR http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc41_multiple_geometry_fields I've made a few changes in the last few days. See the history :

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt RFC 41 : Support for multiple geometry fields in OGR

2013-08-01 Thread Even Rouault
Selon Andre Joost andre+jo...@nurfuerspam.de: Am 01.08.2013 16:16, schrieb Even Rouault: Hi, Motion: I move to adopt RFC 41 : Support for multiple geometry fields in OGR http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc41_multiple_geometry_fields I've made a few changes in the last few

Re: [gdal-dev] Using the OGR library with FileGDB driver

2013-08-01 Thread Carl Godkin
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Carl Godkin cgod...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Even Rouault even.roua...@mines-paris.org wrote: I wonder if there is a way to determine if a .gdb is using a custom coordinate system so we can make a sensible error message. I find

[gdal-dev] Overflow in geojson values

2013-08-01 Thread Smith, Michael ERDC-RDE-CRREL-NH
I'm reading a geojson feed put out by the USGS (http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/feed/v1.0/summary/all_day.geojson) but the time/updated values are overflowing. Are there any settings to allow the data to come across as bigint or strings? For example:

Re: [gdal-dev] Overflow in geojson values

2013-08-01 Thread Kyle Shannon
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Smith, Michael ERDC-RDE-CRREL-NH michael.sm...@erdc.dren.mil wrote: I'm reading a geojson feed put out by the USGS (http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/feed/v1.0/summary/all_day.geojson) but the time/updated values are overflowing. Are there any settings to

Re: [gdal-dev] Overflow in geojson values

2013-08-01 Thread Smith, Michael ERDC-RDE-CRREL-NH
Unfortunately, that¹s after the data has been read and overflowed. The time should be 1375291903959. Updated should be 1375295733317. Mike On 8/1/13 2:21 PM, Kyle Shannon k...@pobox.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Smith, Michael ERDC-RDE-CRREL-NH michael.sm...@erdc.dren.mil wrote:

Re: [gdal-dev] Overflow in geojson values

2013-08-01 Thread Dmitriy Baryshnikov
Hi, GDAL GeoJSON driver use modified and outdated json-c. It seem to me that this is the bug and ticket in track needed. Best regards, Dmitriy 01.08.2013 22:31, Smith, Michael ERDC-RDE-CRREL-NH пишет: Unfortunately, that¹s after the data has been read and overflowed. The time should be

Re: [gdal-dev] Overflow in geojson values

2013-08-01 Thread Even Rouault
Selon Dmitriy Baryshnikov bishop@gmail.com: Hi, GDAL GeoJSON driver use modified and outdated json-c. It seem to me that this is the bug and ticket in track needed. It would be a 2 step work. I indeed see that newer json-c supports int64, so a first step would be to make the GeoJSON

Re: [gdal-dev] Overflow in geojson values

2013-08-01 Thread Frank Warmerdam
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Even Rouault even.roua...@mines-paris.orgwrote: Selon Dmitriy Baryshnikov bishop@gmail.com: Hi, GDAL GeoJSON driver use modified and outdated json-c. It seem to me that this is the bug and ticket in track needed. It would be a 2 step work. I indeed

Re: [gdal-dev] Overflow in geojson values

2013-08-01 Thread Dmitriy Baryshnikov
I really like the RFC31! Also it'll be great to have a chocie to build GDAL with internal and external json-c, as libtif, libjpeg, etc. are. And drop patched version of json-c. Best regards, Dmitriy 02.08.2013 0:36, Frank Warmerdam пишет: On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Even Rouault