Jan Heckman gmail.com> writes:
>
>
> Hi,It appears I have to do some homework on ogr's shapefile functions as
it stands now.
>
> 8GB: If interoperability is more of a priority than capacity, that's a
valid consideration. I've not really needed anything > 4GB so far.
>
> Delete:
> By delete I
Hello Jan,
On a related note: for the Fedora package which I maintain, I've also
added a number of out of tree patches: mainly backporting the
improvements from the version bundled in gdal as well as replacing the
buildsystem with an autotools one, to allow easy mingw
cross-compilation. My pa
Hi,
I am a bit confused right now about a possible difference in encoding
attribute value that I have noticed between those two drivers (MapInfo File
vs ESRI Shapefile).
I have a script that allow user to export some features from database to
shapefile or MapInfo TAB format. However, in MapInfo T
Hi,
It appears I have to do some homework on ogr's shapefile functions as it
stands now.
8GB: If interoperability is more of a priority than capacity, that's a
valid consideration. I've not really needed anything > 4GB so far.
Delete:
By delete I mean leaving the information in the file but (shap
Timothy,
I just ran gdal_contour (from gdal-1.10.1) on
http://dds.cr.usgs.gov/srtm/version2_1/SRTM1/Region_01/N38W114.hgt.zip with
the options -i 10 and -a height. I got a shape file of ~95MB. Please check
your data file and gdal version.
BTW, you can directly save the contours into a postgis tab
