David Strip gdal at stripfamily.net writes:
At the moment I'm at a loss as to where to start looking for the problem.
Any suggestions are most welcome.
Send us links to the images you have created with GDAL and which make
troubles with QGIS. Perhaps someone finds what is wrong in these images.
Hi Even,
I just created ticket http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/5467
I'm no expert in ENVI files but found the only way to get the .hdr files
working in the ENVI application was to change the Unknown map info
projection to Arbitrary. The best reference I've found for this is
Matt,
thanks for the report. I'm a bit surprised this hasn't been reported before as
it dates back to 1.10.0. Anyway, I've created a ticket
http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/5468 for that issue and pushed a fix for
1.10, 1.11 and trunk branches.
I cannot think to a workaround, apart from
Hi,
I've followed the update process of the EPSG SRS database to latest v8.4, and
just committed the updated files into libgeotiff, GDAL and PROJ trunk. Also
submitted to PostGIS.
From what I can see, among many changes and additions, 2 new projection
methods have been added:
* 1051,Lambert
Le mardi 13 mai 2014 16:44:03, David Tran a écrit :
Hi
test.pro
TEMPLATE = app
TARGET = test
DEPENDPATH += $$PWD/src $$PWD/include
INCLUDEPATH += $$PWD/src $$PWD/include
SOURCES += src/main.cpp
main.cpp
//#include ogr_api.h
#include ogrsf_frmts.h
int main() {}
It
Le mardi 13 mai 2014 15:23:12, Fabian Niggemann a écrit :
Hi,
I?m trying to link gdal to fortrangis to use the gdal fortran interface
on Ubuntu 12.04. I?ve installed gdal Version 1.11. and installed the
fortrangis package with disabled shared libraries.
If I try now to compile a fortran
Am 14.05.2014 13:33, schrieb Even Rouault:
Le mardi 13 mai 2014 15:23:12, Fabian Niggemann a écrit :
Hi,
I?m trying to link gdal to fortrangis to use the gdal fortran interface
on Ubuntu 12.04. I?ve installed gdal Version 1.11. and installed the
fortrangis package with disabled shared
so which ones are remaining, following the clarification you mention below?
Hi Peter,
thanks for the clarifications.
To be honest, my main reluctance to GML-based standards is that they are very
rich, and thus difficult to understand and implement. A rather large chain of
depending standards
pretty interesting - it would be nice to incorporate the gdal fortran
bindings inside the gdal source!
however, it is distributed under the GNU Lesser General Public License, so
I think it's not possible...
Cheers
Etienne
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Fabian Niggemann
Hi,
I wonder if it would make any sense in the GDAL context to have an option in
the OSM driver to separate geometries and tags and write them into their own
tables. The structure of the resulting tables (5 + 5 for points, lines,
multilines, multipolygons and relations) would be like:
Geometry
Am 14.05.2014 16:41, schrieb Jukka Rahkonen:
I wonder if it would make any sense in the GDAL context to have an option in
the OSM driver to separate geometries and tags and write them into their own
tables. The structure of the resulting tables (5 + 5 for points, lines,
multilines,
Le mercredi 14 mai 2014 16:41:02, Jukka Rahkonen a écrit :
Hi,
I wonder if it would make any sense in the GDAL context to have an option
in the OSM driver to separate geometries and tags and write them into
their own tables. The structure of the resulting tables (5 + 5 for points,
lines,
Hi Even,
On 5/14/2014 2:22 AM, Even Rouault wrote:
Matt,
thanks for the report. I'm a bit surprised this hasn't been reported before as
it dates back to 1.10.0. Anyway, I've created a ticket
http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/5468 for that issue and pushed a fix for
1.10, 1.11 and trunk
Andre Joost andre+joost at nurfuerspam.de writes:
Am 14.05.2014 16:41, schrieb Jukka Rahkonen:
I wonder if it would make any sense in the GDAL context to have an option in
the OSM driver to separate geometries and tags and write them into their own
tables. The structure of the
Hi,
is there planetary datum support in this new version (i.e. Moon 2000, or etc.)?
Yann
On 14/05/2014, Even Rouault even.roua...@mines-paris.org wrote:
Hi,
I've followed the update process of the EPSG SRS database to latest v8.4,
and
just committed the updated files into libgeotiff, GDAL
15 matches
Mail list logo
