Re: [gdal-dev] NetCDF driver improvements (including groups support)

2015-03-29 Thread Etienne Tourigny
Hi Julien These improvements look really great! Unfortunately I am on a long-term vacation and semi-retired from my GIS work. So I am sorry but I cannot really help on testing and committing the work... That is why I did not respond sooner. As the last official netcdf maintainer I should at

Re: [gdal-dev] RFC 44: Add Parseable Output Formats for ogrinfo and gdalinfo

2015-03-29 Thread Jukka Rahkonen
Robert Coup robert.coup at koordinates.com writes: Hi, Good work, thanks for taking this on! 1: Is there any particular reason to implement XML? Every language has a good JSON parser these days, as you note in the RFC XML is more complex to implement, and it's not like strict schemas or

[gdal-dev] Ubuntu packages with debugging

2015-03-29 Thread Tim Keitt
I'm looking for a version of libgdal1h or libgdal1-dev compiled with debugging symbols. Anyone know of a source? THK -- http://www.keittlab.org/ ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

[gdal-dev] Coordination of potential mentors for GDAL GSoc 2015

2015-03-29 Thread Even Rouault
Hi, According to https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!topic/osgeo-gsoc- mentors/rqYSNPxHd0c we have until April 6th to discuss and rank proposals. As stated by Margherita, this must be done in a private way due to discussions on personal merits of applicants. I suggest we do that in a Google

Re: [gdal-dev] RFC 44: Add Parseable Output Formats for ogrinfo and gdalinfo

2015-03-29 Thread Robert Coup
Hi, Good work, thanks for taking this on! 1: Is there any particular reason to implement XML? Every language has a good JSON parser these days, as you note in the RFC XML is more complex to implement, and it's not like strict schemas or streaming (usual reasons for XML) are going to be in place.